User talk:Trevor Sinclair

Hi. This depends upon which article you intend to edit; the Eastern carpenter bee or the Carpenter bee. The UGA website you refer to explicitly deals with the former, and it would be a perfectly acceptable and useful contribution to that article. It would, however, be completely misleading to insert it into the latter article, as many of the Old World carpenter bees, especially those in Africa, are extremely valuable pollinators. Just because we have one species in the US that doesn't live up to its billing doesn't mean the same applies across the board to ALL species of carpenter bee. Further, just because it is a pest does not mean it is not also beneficial; paper wasps and yellowjackets are extremely beneficial, as are house centipedes, yet they are all considered pests. Dyanega (talk) 23:40, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!  Will Beback   talk    08:14, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style


 * PS: Thanks again for contributing your research to Talk:Leopold and Loeb. In the future, Be bold. Cheers,   Will Beback    talk    08:14, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Bloop
I wonder if you'd be interested in helping a fellow rationalist with the article Bloop. It seems one scientist is at fault for the problem, he told the press that it's probably biological, although it was far too loud for that. I wrote you this message because you seemed to be interested in anti-cryptozoology. Chrisrus (talk) 03:37, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:PG Cover Large.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:PG Cover Large.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:09, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

New Rational Skepticism WikiProject member asking for look at Theosophy entry
Since you are an active participant in the Rational Skepticism WikiProject, would you mind looking over the Wikipedia entry on Theosophy to see if you find any concerns?

I've been ordered to fix the page so that it accords with my understanding of the NPOV policy. I'm happy to do that but I have a lot of work at my job.

Now I've been told that I must make the changes by April 30th or the NPOV tag will be removed. I simply can't learn how to use Wikipedia as a newcomer, become familiar with all the sources, and make the edits if I must do it all by April 30th.

Would you look over the Theosophy page? Also, can you recommend anything? Thanks much,Factseducado (talk) 14:52, 27 April 2012 (UTC)