User talk:U-Mos/Archives/2013/August

Waterloo Road Series 9 article
Hi there U-Mos. I just wanted to let you know that the edits being made to the Waterloo Road Series 9 article seem to be reverted regularly by user Davey2010. He has stated up to now that episode info should only be added on the day of or day after broadcast. Just to warn, as he will no doubt revert your edits too. In all honesty, it would be better if you took the page into control (at least your edits are fair) 2.97.8.45 (talk) 17:06, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I'll keep an eye out. U-Mos (talk) 17:53, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
 * No worries :-) 2.97.8.45 (talk) 19:34, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I revert disruptive ips, not respected editors! (Also If you bothered adding a reference it would've been left!), Per WP:OWNERSHIP anyone can edit the page (not just U-Mos nor me), Also you were reverted by 3 editors so consensus was to have them removed!. →Davey 2010→  →Talk to me!→
 * So you’re also a liar! There was a source there, an in actually fact it is the very same source that is there right now - and YOU deleted it when you reverted the edit! And I wasn't reverted by 3 editors at all, just you! Get your facts right before you start playing the blame game! What I edited was in no way different to what is there RIGHT now, source included. You chose to remove it and cite it as "speculative", despite the fact what was there was in keeping with wiki guidelines. And if that wasn't enough - you stated all episode information is only added on the day of or day after broadcast. Ok, so if that is true, then how come what U-Mos has written is still there? Exactly! Because it isn’t is it? There was no issue at all. The only issue there there was how difficulty you were being when it came to editing! And as far as who can and can't edit - you should take your own advice and read WP:OWNERSHIP before you revert edits for no reason!! Who are you to class users as "disruptive" when you were the only one being a pain?! 2.97.8.45 (talk) 19:32, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

EDIT: U-MOS, I apologize to you for having written this on your user talk. It's not your issue I know. So I apologize for that. 2.97.8.45 (talk) 19:43, 29 August 2013 (UTC) →Davey 2010→ →Talk to me!→  20:07, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Please read WP:NPA, Threatening & abusive behaviour will result in you being blocked!''!,
 * As far as I can see apart from Ep2 - there was no source on first ep?, U-Mos added reference - You didn't? .....
 * I apologize for I revert disruptive ips which i've striked,
 * I wasn't at all being difficult, Just following rules .....-


 * The problem Davey2010 is I did add a reference when I first edited it, directly from the BBC Press office, as U-Mos did, and I also re-wrote the synopsis as per the rules on direct copy and paste from websites. I followed the rules. OK, apology accepted. I also apologize for being a pain on your talk page. But what I would really like to know is why you told me episodes cannot be added until the day of/day after broadcast, and yet U-Mos has done exactly what I have done, yet its fine? 2.97.8.45 (talk) 20:15, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
 * In that case I never noticed and again I apologize,
 * Thanks and you're forgiven,
 * I totally forgot about refs and somehow came with Crystal - If i knew you added refs I'd of never reverted you :-(.....
 * Also apologies to U-Mos for this! →Davey 2010→  →Talk to me!→  20:07, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Well, it seems it was a big misunderstanding then. Look, its ok and I accept your apology (again lol). If you really didn't know then its a simple accident. How about we forget it and move on from this. I'll edit as best I can and if I do mess up, just let me know, deal? I'll contact the Wikipedia representative I've been in contact with regarding my complaint and retract it fully, so no harm done :). Thank you for your apology Davey2010, and please accept my apology too. And of course full apologies to you too U-Mos, even though your talk page has resolved a dispute lol. 2.97.8.45 (talk) 20:31, 29 August 2013 (UTC)