User talk:Udibi

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! (from Australia).Blnguyen 04:26, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Image tagging for Image:Halliburton.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Halliburton.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 09:05, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Halliburton.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Halliburton.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 21:43, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

January 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to Heath Ledger has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks.  Snowolf How can I help? 00:53, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Heath Ledger. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Gwernol 00:56, 23 January 2008 (UTC)


 * I appreciate that you all are trying to maintain a page during a time when many people are trying to make innumerable edits, both valid and otherwise, but this is completely out of hand. The information that I inserted and that was "reverted" as "unconstructive" is now a permanent (as much as anything on Wikipedia can be) part of the article.  At the time, the news reports were changing so quickly that I couldn't keep up with a source.  Mind you, I added a single word, "naked", to describe Health Ledger at the time of his death.  Apparently the human body in its unadorned state is so controversial that the mere word "naked" requires its own footnote!  That single word earned me TWO warnings.


 * Right after I received my first two warnings (the first, thankfully, friendly - I do appreciate that, Snowolf), I went back to the article. Trying to rectify my earlier "infraction," at the end of a relevant thread of the discussion page I added a link to an Associated Free Press article to substantiate the nudity. Next thing I know, I get another instant response - a "Level 4" vandalism warning.  I went back and looked up what that means (= "Assumes bad faith; strong cease and desist, last warning").  To issue that level of warning - or ANY warning for that matter - to something completely appropriate....well, I just hope that all you Wikipedia gurus just had your hands too full and lost track of what you were doing.  All I can say is, that is probably the last time I will touch an article that is breaking news. This is all too much! Udibi (talk) 06:33, 23 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Sorry for the harsh warning for something that wasn't vandalism. Vandalfighting sometimes requires snap decissions, and this time I was wrong. I apologize deeply and hope that you will stay and further edit. I have obviously removed the warning and hope the matter is settled. See you around the 'pedia, Poeloq (talk) 15:40, 23 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Thank you for looking into this and clearing up the matter. I can certainly understand that it must sometimes be difficult to make the quick judgment calls required to fight vandals. Udibi (talk) 18:00, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

William Alexander
Hi, Udibi! I'm curious about your recent addition to List of gay, lesbian or bisexual people: K-L of William Alexander Levy. That article (on Levy) makes no mention of his sexuality and isn't in any LGBT-related cats, though I see that you put the LGBTProject banner on the talk page. In addition, I'm unable to review Max's "Lives and Adventures" - at least not through Google Books. Could you clarify the situation? Thanks! -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 15:33, 8 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Well, I'm having a hard time with this. I'm all for him being gay [ =) ], but it's considered "controversial" info, meaning it really should be a) explicit in his article, and b) properly sourced.  Is it possible to find a better ref? And add it to his article?  I'd feel much better about including him on the list then.  Many thanks for your hard work!! -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 00:38, 11 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Sorry - didn't see the ref you added to the list! That one works for me (the Ted Wells podcast description).  But the Levy article really should have some mention of his sexuality :) Thanks again!!! -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 00:44, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

May 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to Talk:Glendora (Television producer and host) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Razorflame Report false positives 00:09, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Cheb
Thanks for the corrections to the Cheb article. But I am not sure about the population to majority change. See Talk:Cheb. Jirka6 (talk) 04:03, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Voting Zones A&B Carinthia.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Voting Zones A&B Carinthia.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 07:53, 4 November 2008 (UTC)


 * I sure love those automated bots! For me, at least, they only cause more work - and no benefit.  That image DID have an adequate explanation, but apparently it didn't tickle the bot just right.  Oh well..... Udibi (talk) 07:11, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Halliburton.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Halliburton.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:46, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

January 2018
Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Zoey Tur, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sum mer PhD v2.0 00:35, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Predator Conservation Alliance


A tag has been placed on Predator Conservation Alliance requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 20:32, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Recent Edits to Glendora Article
You recently made large contributions to Glendora, specifically the history section. Though I know the information to be accurate, the edits were reverted (not by me) because they had no reference. When the Glendora public library reopens, please add this information back to the article with a reference.

Input on the "Suggestion: Promotion to C-Class" section of the talk page is welcome. A third opinion on several topics discussed would be very helpful. 104.175.94.213 (talk) 21:14, 18 January 2021 (UTC)104.175.94.213

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Asuksa-nga, California, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Serrano. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:04, 18 June 2024 (UTC)