User talk:Ulysses Faye Ohkiph

Macedonia (ancient kingdom)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

1) Your edits are in violation of Wikipedia policy at WP:MOSMAC. 2) Modern Macedonia has nothing to do with the article Macedonia (ancient kingdom). Cease your edit warring and trying to push your nationalist POV or else your editing privileges may be blocked. --Taivo (talk) 11:10, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

June 2015
Please make an effort to calmly approach any differences you may be having with other editors. This edit summary and this talk page message are simply unhelpful as well as insulting. Please be more careful.  Tide  rolls  14:16, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

October 2015
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 09:33, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

May 2017
Hello, I'm User: ExplodingPoPUps. An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. By the way, why Chinese characters is included in languages and also there is no Chinese script link showing on what you did on Kyrgyz language.  Exploding  PoPUps 22:07, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

November 2017
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at National Anthem of the Sakha Republic. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.  Scr ★ pIron IV 16:08, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
 * reply User:ScrapIronIV: He is a sock. Not Watson, but the Cyrillic Chubuevo. Ulysses Faye Ohkiph (talk) 16:14, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
 * A sock of whom? Diabedia? I’m curious to know. Zombie Dragon (talk) 12:44, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

December 2017
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい 18:02, 25 December 2017 (UTC)


 * "Your explanations fall short" is a figure of speech. It doesn't mean "your explanations were not long enough" but "they were not convincing". Huon (talk) 15:34, 21 January 2018 (UTC)


 * "Administrators should consider: whether the user has engaged in that behavior before." - You mean we should consider whether you previously engaged in personal attacks, as you did here, here, here? Huon (talk) 23:27, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

I know you Germans are almost the most righteous people in the world, even deleted the first & second stances of Deutschlandlied. You cannot stand the bad bahavior at all, especially about racial and humanity. I really admire that, so please allow me to say sorry to you again. "Cultural colonist" and "racist" is the same meaning of the word "racist" this time, which I have already regretted. Despite this, your first accuse of the three is not an attack, for Nursultan Nazarbayev changed the Kazakh latinization of Kazakh language, and the editor REALLY do not know when reversing some text in Kazakh. He has a plenty kinds of reason (such as "copyright", "wikipedia policy", and even "too long"... But all them are not adequate) on deleting lyrics and its transliteration of Central Asian national anthems, which is completely legal. Don't you think this site should delete planty of legal text without limitation? But all these above are not important. Cowards and idiots always have excuses. If I committed something bad I should only promise. I've said that "if I committed again, you must instantly block my editing access of all pages", as you already gave me the chance to promise, I can only promise like that. You can regard it as a treaty or agreement, or an ultimatum for me. I beg your pardon sincerely. Ulysses Faye Ohkiph (talk) 04:35, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
 * For the edition long ago, you should block me at that time, that should be "the first". 3 years is enough for people to have a completely mental change. On the contrary, if you blocked me then, the disruptive editing of the template in last December may not be happened. "First" only means the first block, that should not be permanent, and will be a warning of the attacker. After all, "Taivo" sir did not even accuse me as attacking, so that I did not realized then... I should pay my regret to him/her now.