User talk:Umofomia

Stroke order
I'm sorry to don't have a perfect english, but I wrote this Stroke_order & Stroke_order which may answer to you Yug  (talk)  17:07, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * You noticed there : Talk:Stroke_order, that stroke order may change.

Taiwanese Mandarin
Posted on User talk:LDHan 08:36, 27 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for pointing out the distinction between perfect and perfective. I just felt the translation of 你吃了吗? as "did you eat?" is not really idiomatic English. And if the two phrases are not interchangeable, then perhaps they are not a useful illustration of the 有 construction. Please correct if I've made any mistakes. LDHan 10:25, 27 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Replied 00:10, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Fix this template
Posted on User talk:Wikimachine 22:07, 6 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Replied 23:19, 6 April 2007 (UTC)


 * I'm very sorry for messing up the template. I tried to fix it according to a new proposal laid out in WikiProject Korea's discussion page. Thanks for your concern. (Wikimachine 22:54, 7 April 2007 (UTC))

Stroke order according to each country
hello, The article Stroke order now contain data to answer to a previous question : Talk:Stroke order
 * see : Stroke order
 * and : Which stroke order for each style

Other question : do you allow me to archive your question "Talk:Stroke order" in one week ? Yug (talk)  16:35, 14 June 2007 (UTC)


 * ........... I want archive it exactly for such cases : it's the 2nd time I inform you about this......... Sorry......
 * —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yug (talk • contribs) 16:38, 14 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Replied on User talk:Yug 17:49, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Noticed. thanks for your answer. ;) Yug 15:22, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Gweilo
Posted on User talk:HenryLi 23:45, 1 March 2008 (UTC)


 * I've just restored the deleted. &mdash; HenryLi (Talk) 15:40, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Chinese cash
You have previously participated in discussions of the title of the article Chinese wén. If you care, please discuss a resolution of this issue by suggesting your preferred title at Talk:Chinese wén. —  AjaxSmack   01:55, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Extremaduran language
Would you can to help me, in the article Extremaduran language? —Preceding unsigned comment added by El estremeñu (talk • contribs) 01:04, 6 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Replied on User talk:El estremeñu 01:11, 8 August 2009 (UTC)


 * You can to help me, correcting ortographics or linguistic errors, please, make it... :::My English is very bad... —Preceding unsigned comment added by El estremeñu (talk • contribs) 01:48, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 01:28, 18 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Replied on User talk:Courcelles 21:39, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia_talk:Article_titles
There is currently a policy discussion that may concern a Wikiproject that you are a member of Wikipedia_talk:Article_titles. Handschuh-talk to me 02:18, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

Research survey invitation
Greetings Umofomia-

My name is Randall Livingstone, and I am a doctoral student at the University of Oregon, studying digital media and online community. I am posting to invite you to participate in my research study exploring the work of Wikipedia editors who are members of WikiProject: Countering Systemic Bias. The online survey should take 20 to 25 minutes to complete and can be found here:

https://oregon.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_cSHzuwaQovaZ6ss

Your responses will help online communication researchers like me to better understand the collaborations, challenges, and purposeful work of Wikipedia editors like you. In addition, at the end of the survey you will have the opportunity to express your interest in a follow-up online interview with the researcher.

This research project has been reviewed and approved by the Wikimedia Research Committee as well as the Office for Protection of Human Subjects at the University of Oregon. For a detailed description of the project, please visit its Meta page. This survey is voluntary, and your confidentiality will be protected. You will have the choice of using your Wikipedia User Name during the research or creating a unique pseudonym. You may skip any question you choose, and you may withdraw at any time. By completing the survey, you are providing consent to participate in the research.

If you have any questions about the study, please contact me via my Talk Page (UOJComm) or via email. My faculty advisor is Dr. Ryan Light. If you have any questions regarding your rights as a research participant, please contact the Office for Protection of Human Subjects at the University of Oregon.

Thank you very much.

Sincerely,

Randall Livingstone School of Journalism & Communication University of Oregon UOJComm (talk) 18:44, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested


WikiProject Writing Systems is conducting a poll regarding its future goals, and we have identified you as a person with a vested interest in the future of that project. Whether you are a member of the WikiProject, a frequent contributor, or a passerby with an interest in the subject, we want your input as to the future emphasis that the Writing Systems project will take. Please take a moment to peruse the entries and add your comments where you have an opinion. You can visit the poll by clicking here, or on the project image, 書, on the right. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vanisaac  (talk • contribs)  12:31, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Two variants of lowercase G
you were actually wrong at this point, they do: g ɡ. Use some tools to reveal Unicode code points next time, before boldly editing data you are not familiar with. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 22:05, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Nobel Laureates in the University Infobox
I noticed you added a "Nobel Laureates" section to MIT's infobox today more than 4 years ago but it is not a part of the university infobox template. I have added a new section to discuss this topic on the Template talk:Infobox university page. I think the wiki community would like to hear what you have to say about this subject, not just as the first person to add it to MIT's infobox, but as a notable wiki contributor. --Triesault (talk) 01:15, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Are you active?
I'm writing on behalf of WikiProject Linguistics to see if you are active or not. I've moved your name to the inactive participants list. If you are active, feel free to move your name back to the active participants list. We hope you come back soon! Joeystanley (talk) 21:28, 23 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Replied on User talk:Joeystanley 18:46, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Population update project
Hi. The 18th edition of Ethnologue just came out, and if we divide up our language articles among us, it won't take long to update them. I would appreciate it if you could help out, even if it's just a few articles (5,000 articles is a lot for just me), but I won't be insulted if you delete this request.

A largely complete list of articles to be updated is at Category:Language articles citing Ethnologue 17. The priority articles are in Category:Language articles with old Ethnologue 17 speaker data. These are the 10% that have population figures at least 25 years old.

Probably 90% of the time, Ethnologue has not changed their figures between the 17th and 18th editions, so all we need to do is change "e17" to "e18" in the reference (ref) field of the language info box. That will change the citation for the artcle to the current edition. Please put the data in the proper fields, or the info box will flag it as needing editorial review. The other relevant fields are "speakers" (the number of native speakers in all countries), "date" (the date of the reference or census that Ethnologue uses, not the date of Ethnologue!), and sometimes "speakers2". Our convention has been to enter e.g. "1990 census" when a census is used, as other data can be much older than the publication date. Sometimes a citation elsewhere in the article depends on the e17 entry, in which case you will need to change "name=e17" to "name=e18" in the reference tag (assuming the 18th edition still supports the cited claim).

Remember, we want the *total* number of native speakers, which is often not the first figure given by Ethnologue. Sometimes the data is too incompatible to add together (e.g. a figure from the 1950s for one country, and a figure from 2006 for another), in which case it should be presented that way. That's one use for the "speakers2" field. If you're not sure, just ask, or skip that article.

Data should not be displayed with more than two, or at most three, significant figures. Sometimes it should be rounded off to just one significant figure, e.g. when some of the component data used by Ethnologue has been approximated with one figure (200,000, 3 million, etc.) and the other data has greater precision. For example, a figure of 200,000 for one country and 4,230 for another is really just 200,000 in total, as the 4,230 is within the margin of rounding off in the 200,000. If you want to retain the spurious precision of the number in Ethnologue, you might want to use the sigfig template. (First parameter in this template is for the data, second is for the number of figures to round it off to.)

Dates will often need to be a range of all the country data in the Ethnologue article. When entering the date range, I often ignore dates from countries that have only a few percent of the population, as often 10% or so of the population isn't even separately listed by Ethnologue and so is undated anyway.

If Ethnologue does not provide a date for the bulk of the population, just enter "no date" in the date field. But if the population figure is undated, and hasn't changed between the 17th & 18th editions of Ethnologue, please leave the ref field set to "e17", and maybe add a comment to keep it so that other editors don't change it. In cases like this, the edition of Ethnologue that the data first appeared in may be our only indication of how old it is. We still cite the 14th edition in a couple dozen articles, so our readers can see that the data is getting old.

The articles in the categories linked above are over 90% of the job. There are probably also articles that do not currently cite Ethnologue, but which we might want to update with the 18th edition. I'll need to generate another category to capture those, probably after most of the Ethnologue 17 citations are taken care of.

Jump in at the WP:LANG talk page if you have any comments or concerns. Thanks for any help you can give!

— kwami (talk) 02:09, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of RentHop


The article RentHop has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "An advertorially toned page on an unremarkable startup of local interest. Significant RS coverage not found. The article is cited to passing mentions, launch publicity, blogs, WP:SPIP, and other sources otherwise not suitable for notability. Fails WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:02, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of RentHop for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article RentHop is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/RentHop until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:50, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

"List of phases" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect List of phases and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 10 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 12:05, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

"Queensboro" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Queensboro&redirect=no Queensboro] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at until a consensus is reached. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 19:09, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)