User talk:Uranium grenade

Burj Dubai and its height on BurjDubai.com
Uranium grenade, I see what you are referring to. But, if Emaar was ready to announce a new height of the Burj Dubai they would change it under the "Construction Statistics" section on their website. I am sure they want the publicity and would change it as soon as possible. Also, the say "tallest structure in the world." That sentence is very ambiguous. We do not know if they are only referring to free-standing structures or to all man-made structures in the world. I think it is best to wait until they announce a new height for the Burj Dubai or make an official statement. Thank you discussing this instead of starting an edit war. Leitmanp (talk | contributions) 21:15, 13 March 2008 (UTC)


 * No, I do not think we should add it. Like I said above, we should wait until we have an official statement with an exact height.  If you still think we should add it, you should discuss it at Talk:Burj Dubai where more people will be able to discuss it.  Leitmanp (talk | contributions) 20:25, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 17:31, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

March 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. Please remember to observe our core policies. If you believe your edit(s) did contribute positively to the article, please start a discussion on the article's talk page and notify me so I can improve my anti-vandal efforts by learning from my mistakes in order to make less in future. George D. Watson  (Dendodge). Talk Help 00:45, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 16:17, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Indefinitely blocked
I have indefinitely blocked this account. Tom Harrison Talk 17:05, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, I mistook your edits for vandalism. I've unblocked. Sorry for any inconvenience. Tom Harrison Talk 17:19, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Try now. Tom Harrison Talk 17:29, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

RZA is a philosopher
Considering the fact that he wrote The Wu-Tang manual, should he be categorized under American philosophers??? The book is based on philosophy, so should'nt he listed as one, just like Bruce Lee? (LonerXL (talk) 00:19, 24 June 2009 (UTC))

RZA may soon move forward as philosopher, considering the fact that he is currently working in a second Wu-tang Manual. Even 50 cent is writing a book with Robert Greene - "The 50th Law." Have you noticed that more rappers are writing philosophical boooks now? It's possible that they may soon be within the ranks of modern day philosophers. I clearly understand your point of view. However, you are looking at past philosophers, while I am looking at the current, modern day philosophers. I believe you may soon find yourself listing certain rappers and philosophers in the same wiki categories. Bruce Lee was considered as a philosopher first and martial artist second. Nice discussion we had here, even though we have a disagreement. Please enjoy your weekend and be safe.(LonerXL (talk) 17:21, 25 June 2009 (UTC))

Nomination of Kirisute Gomen for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kirisute Gomen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kirisute Gomen until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:55, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:22, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

May 2019
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Beyond Belief: Islamic Excursions among the Converted Peoples, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 18:34, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! Doug Weller talk 18:34, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

June 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Dark Souls, you may be blocked from editing. -- ferret (talk) 20:20, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Mistake - in Education it says Musk earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in Physics and an Economics degree in Science. It would be the other way around.
Correct the right areas or faculties to which the degrees were earned. 2604:3D08:5777:9B00:7D31:6B49:93DA:A8C2 (talk) 05:05, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Yo, thanks for getting in touch :) I read your message and it made a lot of sense to me, but I googled it and apparently some universities have offerings such as Bachelor of Arts in Physics, which does seem odd to me, but apparently that's a thing! Uranium grenade (talk) 13:06, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

 * You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. 

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)