User talk:Urbandweller

Speedy deletion of Stih & Schnock
A tag has been placed on Stih & Schnock requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Woland (talk) 21:46, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Urbandweller! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:58, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) David Summers -

Takk
Hei, og mange takk for at du har spolert mitt arbeide med å lage et dualt sett av artikkeltitler, nemlig "Navn" og "Navn (noble family)". Det var dog sikkert ikke din hensikt. Hvorledes skal jeg nu klare å opprette "ambiguity"-artikler?

--- Aaemn784 (talk) 09:01, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Der er ingen flertydighed (ambiguity) eller forvekslingsmulighed ved de pågældende artikler, så én artikel er nok. --Urbandweller (talk) 16:07, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Hi
Do me a favour and revert back to the latest version made by user Aunva6 on the Emmelie de Forest article. User Winson has been blocked for a few days. Cheers.--BabbaQ (talk) 01:22, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Niels Bohr
In answer to your question on Niels Bohr, "If having a Jewish mother does not constitute Jewishness, what does?" The answer is that "jew" is a religious designation, not genetic. Someone who does not practice the religion is usually termed "jewish descent" rather than "jewish". Do you have any citation showing that Niels Bohr practiced judaism? Tarl.Neustaedter (talk) 20:01, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Peter Tordenskjold
Your attempt to transclude a move request template there didn't work (migtht have to do with the Visual Editor). If you still want the page moved, you might want to try again. However, please review the several discussions about article title on the talk page before you do so. Thanks. wctaiwan (talk) 15:11, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Telefonkiosk
Jeg har fundet af en telefonkiosk på hjørnet af Vesterbrogade og Frederiksberg Allé, som ikke figurerer på listen i artiklen Telefonkiosk som  jeg kan se du har bidraget til. Har du noget bud på hvornår den er opførst? Der er jo tale om den oprindelige Koch-model og da billedet er fra 1919 er det fra før man genoptog brugen af denne model. Derfor ville mit gæt være, at den må være opført sammen med de tidligste kiosker fra 1896. Af den danske artikel fremgår det dog ikke rigtig, om de af den opregnede kiosker fra 1896 er en udtømmende liste. Og kilden til mange af artiklens oplysninger fremgår ikke rigtig. Så kan du opklare spørgsmålet?Ramblersen (talk) 18:21, 11 December 2016 (UTC)