User talk:Vice regent/Archives/2022/June

Your draft article, Draft:Islamic Golden Age in Central Asia


Hello, Vice regent. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Islamic Golden Age in Central Asia".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 03:31, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Muslim resolutions against Ustaše atrocities


Hello, Vice regent. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Muslim resolutions against Ustaše atrocities".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 04:04, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:27, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
 * thanks! I appreciate it :-) VR talk 05:44, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

comment on Christianization of the Roman Empire as diffusion of innovation
You left a comment that the first paragraph of the lead needed clarifying. Any suggestions? It, of course, seems clear to me because I have been immersed in it for so long, so I am at a loss for new ideas right now. If you can point to, well, anything, it would be a great help. I have really struggled with this article. Help? Jenhawk777 (talk) 19:42, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm a bit unclear about what the article is about. Is it about a theory that Christianization of the Roman Empire was associated with the diffusion of innovation? Or is it about using diffusion of innovation to model the Christianization of the Roman Empire? Or something else? VR talk 05:43, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Groan... this is bad. What am I gonna do for people who are unfamiliar with sociology? Diffusion of innovation is a theoretical approach to explaining how society's of all kinds change. It's been applied to the Roman empire in order to explain how the empire was changed. Yes, it's a model. It's a new explanation that's kind of, well, actually, it's revolutionary. It overturns earlier scholarship. I thought the lead explained that. I am apparently completely blind. I cannot see why it doesn't. I am hanging my head in shame, weeping copiously, with no hope. I have no idea what to do with this now. It's a truly important concept - undoing the previous 200 years - that WP should have an article on! And I have failed at communicating this. I am truly at a loss. How would you explain it? Is there another statement in the lead that helps at all? How would you restate? Diffusion is a new alternative explanation for how the Roman empire was Christianized. That's it. That's all there is. Please read the article! Does it get any clearer? Argghh! Sob! Jenhawk777 (talk) 22:37, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Okay! I tried something!  I can't tell if it's an improvement! Jenhawk777 (talk) 22:48, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Can you look at it and tell me what you think? Is it any clearer?  I'm sorry for the melodrama, but you have no idea what I have been through with this article in. the last year. It has been a fight from the get-go, and I am determined not to give up on it. Please help me insure its success.Jenhawk777 (talk) 19:00, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the delay. The first sentence is now much clearer, thanks. I haven't looked at the rest of the article yet. Thanks for taking the time to engage with me.VR talk 19:53, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Ditto! Jenhawk777 (talk) 21:46, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
 * You know, if you are actually going to go to the trouble of reading it, and commenting, it would be a good use of your time if you went ahead and picked up the GAN as the reviewer... how's that for impeccable logic? Hah! Of course, any input is appreciated - but you might consider it. No hard feelings if you don't - just sayin', you know? Jenhawk777 (talk) 22:34, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
 * That is a good point and I might just do that if that article remains unreviewed for a few months. But I'm more interested in providing input at Talk:Bible/GA1 - a more interesting topic, I'm sure you'd agree.VR talk 23:24, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I find this article much more fascinating than the one on Bible. To each his own. Jenhawk777 (talk) 04:54, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:List of south Asian converts to Islam
Hello, Vice regent. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of south Asian converts to Islam, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:04, 29 June 2022 (UTC)