User talk:VisitEureka

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello VisitEureka! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Dirk Beetstra T C 09:06, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Your edits to Eureka (TV series)[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.  REDVERS  SЯEVDEЯ  22:08, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Eureka (TV series), you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
    and you must always:
  4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For more details, please read the Conflict of Interest guideline. Thank you. Betacommand (talkcontribsBot) 23:00, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dont link to your site. Betacommand (talkcontribsBot) 15:48, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, we remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Betacommand (talkcontribsBot) 16:58, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, which you did here: Eureka (TV series). If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.HalfShadow 17:16, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 48 hours as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. That includes edit warring using your account and multiple IP addresses (ie. 172.206.6.209 and 172.141.1.236) as you have been doing. WjBscribe 18:12, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I simply don't care.[edit]

I didn't get involved until you decided to have a temper-tantrum and began deleting sections of the article, and then though it'd be fun to start using ip addresses to get what you want; even resorting to threats. My only interest is in keeping things as they are or should be. You don't enter into the equation. HalfShadow 18:13, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please see this thread I have posted in regards to your website. In conclusion please do not add any links/cites to your website until consensus is reached on the talk page. Thank you, Matthew 17:23, 23 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Your edit to Eureka (TV series)[edit]

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Eureka (TV series), you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
    and you must always:
  4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

Accounts used solely for blatant self-promotion may be blocked indefinitely without further warning.

For more details, please read the Conflict of Interest guideline. Thank you.

This is again a COI warning. Please discuss your edits on the talkpage and/or explain your position here. Thank you! --Dirk Beetstra T C 08:17, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Eureka (TV series). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Thank you. --Dirk Beetstra T C 08:46, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:EurekaS1dvd-3d.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:EurekaS1dvd-3d.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 03:24, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:PKJTitleCard.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:PKJTitleCard.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:25, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]