User talk:Vmaldia

Edit to Shakey's Pizza
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, Wikipedia is not censored, not even to remove profanity or pornography. Please do not remove or censor information that is relevant to the article. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Ronbo76 02:47, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

January 2009
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. [ジャム] [ t -  c  ] 17:13, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

March 2009
Thank you for your recent contributions to. While the Wikipedia community appreciates your efforts to increase the amount of information on the site, we cannot accept sources that appear to be the original work of the editor. If the material you added can be attributed to a reliable source, you may add it back if you cite it. This increases the reputation of Wikipedia as a whole and aids in the verifiability of the article. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 14:34, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

December 2009
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Gears of War. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Thejadefalcon Sing your song The bird's seeds 04:05, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

October 2010
Please don't paste copyright text from Amazon into articles. --John (talk) 14:32, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ballistic armor Levels chart concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ballistic armor Levels chart, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 11:49, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission Ballistic armor Levels chart


Hello Vmaldia. It has now been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Ballistic armor Levels chart.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 19:24, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

It appears we have overlapping interests
Hey, how are you, I'm an IP editor who frequently edits nuclear & general energy related articles, along with the Chelyabinsk meteor, asteroid impact avoidance and firearm ballistics too, from time-to-time. Apart from the above articles I've noticed your edits to pages I have also contributed to in the past, namely 5.8×42mm DBP87 and EROEI. My interests at the moment lay more with the latter, as you can see the infuriating talk page dispute I had on that page a number of months ago. I now wish to revisit the article after having given up entirely on getting thru to the authorities.

Mainly, I ask of you to provide a better source for the "2000" figure you have included in that article for the Weibach dual fuel molten salt/lead nuclear reactor. While I am also optimistic that these Gen IV reactor concepts would have high EROEI's, the table listed in that article is of already existing, and therefore fully accounted-for energy sources, not speculative concepts with only the promoters of the concept lauding it's "2000" EROEI figure. So it should be removed from the list, but to satisfy my own curiousity with the tech, do you know of any WP:SECONDARY sources that corroborate the high EROEI of the concept, like an independent assessers report?

You can contact me by leaving a comment on the duck and cover talk page, I'm most active there. I'll see your ping there, and get back to you here. 19:31, 16 June 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.200.172.50 (talk)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)