User talk:VoltaireEditor2016
- Hi there! I tried to began a conversation with you on Donald Trump's talk page, in which I object to your thought that the lawsuits aren't defining for Donald Trump. It seems to me that the lawsuits are notable and it wouldn't be good for Wikipedia to remove them, though I wouldn't object to sending them to a different article. Maybe that article could be populated thoroughly, especially if Trump becomes important in American politics. SocraticOath (talk) 19:04, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
March 2016[edit]
Hello, I'm Lazylaces. Your recent edit to the page Manspreading appears to have added incorrect information, so I removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Lazylaces (Talk to me) 16:11, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:VoltaireEditor2016 reported by User:Winkelvi (Result: ). Thank you. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 16:17, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Considering the fact that there is now an active 3RR report filed against you, it would be wise if you immediately stop editing the Donald Trump article for at least 24 hours. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 16:28, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Donald Trump is covered by discretionary sanctions under WP:ARBAP2[edit]
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 19:42, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Original research at Donald Trump[edit]
Greetings, based on your past contributions to the article, I believe you might be interested in this discussion. Would you please consider participating? Thanks.CFredkin (talk) 17:15, 21 March 2016 (UTC)