User talk:Vvmodel

Welcome!
Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:


 * [[Image:Crystal Clear app ksmiletris.png|23px]]  Introduction
 * 5     The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * [[Image:Crystal package utilities.png|23px]]  How to edit a page
 * [[Image:Crystal khelpcenter.png|23px]]  Help
 * [[Image:Crystal Clear app ktip.png|23px]]  Tips
 * [[Image:Crystal Clear app ksokoban.png|23px|]]  How to write a great article
 * [[Image:Crystal Clear app kedit.png|23px]]  Manual of Style
 * [[Image:Nuvola apps konquest.png|23px]]  Fun stuff...

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Kralizec! (talk) 16:12, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Image
Per your request, I added the image to your user page with the following syntax:
 * [[Image:Desk_D97.jpeg|thumb|right|A model I built of the [[Type 42 destroyer|Type 42]] destroyer HMS Edinburgh (D97).]]

For more assistance on using images, you may find the Wikipedia guideline on Images and especially the Picture tutorial helpful. Have fun! --Kralizec! (talk) 11:51, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:Desk D97.jpeg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Desk D97.jpg. The copy called Image:Desk D97.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 12:30, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to WikiProject Ships
Hi, Vvmodel. I too would like to welcome you to WP:Ships. I noticed your question on Maralia's talk page, and thought I might be able to help answer your question. From my interpretation of the British copyright laws, as long as the images you took were not used for your work (i.e., actually published by your employer), you retain ownership of the photos, and are free to upload them here as you like, whether that be releasing them to the public domain, or licensing them under the GDFL, or the Creative Commons licenses. If you do want to license the images, you'll want to read the details of both licenses to make sure you choose what's right for you. If the images you've taken have been published by your employer, (at least this is my understanding of the copyright laws), they then own the images. In this case, since the ships you've photographed are still in existence, anyone could take pictures of them, so that would fail Fair use. I hope that was helpful, and not too confusing. If you have any other questions, feel free to ask me, or any other WP:Ships member. You can reply here if you want, and I'll see it. Again, welcome aboard :) Regards, Parsecboy (talk) 21:27, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. No problem whatever about ownership - I was working totally freelance on this. Images include all interiors of gallery decks etc on the CV (Illustrious) and panoramics of the frigates and destroyers. Also, detail shots of equipment items. I did a photo tour of the well-deck interior of the LPD (Fearless). Photos of SSN (Trenchant) necessarily topsides only, but they do show the experimental camo scheme. The photos were mainly for my own use, to build accurate models. --Vvmodel (talk) 23:06, 3 March 2008 (UTC)


 * That sounds perfectly fine then; there should be no problems with you uploading as many as you want, under whatever license you so choose. The uploading process isn't too difficult, you just point the page to the location of the image on your computer, and use the drop down menu to pick the appropriate license. There's also a text box for you to provide any other information or description of the image. You can take a look at Image:Camp Victory Baghdad DCN.JPG, an image I uploaded, for an example. Regards, Parsecboy (talk) 00:42, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Just came to let you know that I've responded at my talk page - and I see Parsecboy is on the case, too :) Maralia (talk) 22:26, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

HMS Sheffield
Thanks for your input, if you look at the material now available, there is no difference between the British and Argentine versions of the events. Consensus is currently to merge the two. I don't know where the differences arose but the two accounts have never been that far apart. It is on my list of things to do but I haven't got round to changing it yet. Justin talk 23:17, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:Desk D97OB002.jpeg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:D97OB002.jpg. The copy called Image:D97OB002.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 11:29, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:Desk D97OB001.jpeg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:D97OB001.jpg. The copy called Image:D97OB001.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 11:44, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Ned Doheny
A tag has been placed on Ned Doheny requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Daltxn (talk) 19:30, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Vvmodel! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 17:20, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Ned Doheny -

Proposed deletion of 20 Songs


The article 20 Songs has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable comp

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:15, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of One of These Nights: Boston 1993


The article One of These Nights: Boston 1993 has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable bootleg: there are lots of bootlegs."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ―Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:04, 13 August 2023 (UTC)