User talk:WPjcm

Image copyright problem with Image:Randknight.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Randknight.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. J Milburn (talk) 14:25, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry about that. WP jcm Words are cool 01:38, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Hey...
JCM.  Raiku  Lucifer   Samiyaza  00:16, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi there. Congratulations on the new rollback ability. WP jcm Words are cool 00:18, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Welcoming
Hi. I noticed you are welcoming lots of new users. Welcoming new users is great, I do quite a bit of it myself, but ask yourself, is there a purpose to welcoming users that have created an account, but have not made a single edit yet? Strangely, there are hundreds of such accounts created every week. They create an account and then don't go on to actually use it. Creating talk pages for such users takes up (albeit a tiny amount) space on Wikipedia servers, and such pages are often simply deleted later if the user never comes back and actually edits. It is generally a good idea to welcome users only after they have made at least one edit, so that we know we are actually welcoming a new user, not talking to thin air. Just a thought, keep up the friendly attitude! Beeblebrox (talk) 19:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * OK, I see. I'll only create talk pages for users that edit at least one page. WP jcm Words are cool 19:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Your removal of templated categories
So when you removed usage categories from those software userboxes yesterday... was there any consensus in general? Which part of WP:UBX do they contravene? They've been there for some time so if they didn't abide by policy they'd have been removed already, I suppose. Besides the fact that it's ironic that you still categorize your own userpage with one of the categories you removed you do know that usually you go through a categories for discussion process before doing a mass recategorization or removal, yes? -- Menti  sock  09:28, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Actually, WP:UBX said in bold words "Userboxes should not automatically include categories." Also, there have been a few userbox templates that had a category in s removed to abide by that rule. I'm just finishing some more of the job. WP jcm Words are cool 22:19, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of SmackJeeves
A tag has been placed on SmackJeeves, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. The Weak Willed 21:06, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Webcomics Nation
Hello WPjcm, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of Webcomics Nation - a page you tagged - because: Not unambiguous advertising. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know.  So Why  18:29, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: FictionPress
Hello WPjcm, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of FictionPress - a page you tagged - because: '''Over a million original works does rather make a credible assertion of notability. PROD or take to AfD if required.''' If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. Ged UK  20:42, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
Ged UK  13:43, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ghastly's Ghastly Comic
I have removed the proposed deletion tag you placed on Ghastly's Ghastly Comic because the article was discussed at articles for deletion and is therefore permanently ineligible under the proposed deletion process. I only did this to comply with policy and have no opinion one way or the other on the merits of the deletion nomination. If you wish to pursue deletion, please open another deletion discussion. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 13:49, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

June 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wikia. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikia&action=history page history]. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  J (t)  15:35, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Neutrality?
What's the dispute with Rugrats? I saw you added the template, but you didn't give any reason in your edit summary or on the talk page. I happened to notice as I was scrolling the talk page that it passed the neutrality section in its GA review, so please specify. Paper Luigi T • C 03:52, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 * It was actually just a particular section that I found to be non-neutral. I went ahead and moved the template. ~jcm  03:58, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Adrianne Wadewitz for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adrianne Wadewitz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Adrianne Wadewitz until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Beerest 2 Talk page 02:09, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Update: The discussion was closed as Keep. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia, &mdash; Cirt (talk) 09:09, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Talkback
 Wifione  Message 10:59, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

American Idol - small note
I had misread the sentence, and for some reason thought it read "one of the top-rated" instead of simply "the top-rated." So, yes, it turns out you were right all along. Oops! Davejohnsan (talk) 03:41, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
 * No problem. I'm glad you caught the mistake. ~jcm  18:12, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

"EditThis.info" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=EditThis.info&redirect=no EditThis.info] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. PleaseStand (talk) 11:40, 18 February 2024 (UTC)