User talk:WackyWikiWoo

Orphaned non-free image File:Ultimate Custom Night.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Ultimate Custom Night.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:43, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Storm Area 51
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Storm Area 51 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vami IV -- Vami IV (talk) 04:41, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Storm Area 51
The article Storm Area 51 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Storm Area 51 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vami IV -- Vami IV (talk) 15:21, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Place (Reddit)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Place (Reddit) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kingsif -- Kingsif (talk) 00:01, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Place (Reddit)
The article Place (Reddit) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Place (Reddit) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kingsif -- Kingsif (talk) 20:21, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Storm Area 51
— Maile (talk) 12:02, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Unblock discussion

 * What other accounts have you used for editing?
 * Please read and affirm understanding of Sock puppetry. -- Deep fried okra  User talk:Deepfriedokra 00:14, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

The main account I have used is this one, the others were “throwaway” accounts I created, not knowing about the policy you’ve linked. I have read and understood it now.WackyWikiWoo (talk) 07:55, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Please disclose the complete list of other accounts you have used. --Yamla (talk) 13:08, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
 * They’re on the investigation page, but I’ll reproduce them here:



— Berean Hunter   (talk)  13:43, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
 * WackyWikiWoo (talk) 02:00, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Nothing you've said is truthful. Take a look at Category:Requests for unblock and see that your request has been seen by the project's admins for a week and no one is accepting of your story. Now, you can double down and try to insist that you have been truthful with us or you can revise your unblock request and be honest with us this time.
 * I’m not sure why what I’ve said is so surely untruthful. Given that none of the edits were disruptive, I don’t know what you believe the purpose of these accounts to be other than what I’ve said. I did not know of the rule, and have stated I understand the rule now and I won’t do it again. Even if you think I am lying, can’t I be unblocked on the basis that I understand the rule and won’t make the same mistake again? WackyWikiWoo (talk) 08:14, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
 * No, because we do not accept insincere unblock requests and because I don't believe you that you didn't know that it was policy. Your reply that you didn't know sounds like you are trying to game the system. You've only offered up the accounts that you've got caught with and none of your previous accounts. I don't think this was your first account either.

— Berean Hunter   (talk)  16:17, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
 * You used your main account to make this edit and then returned to that article with five other accounts to remove sections and remove tags (article history). This makes your statement, into absolute nonsense. You used your main account on the article in the first place and there would be no logical reason to create accounts or use your IP for any kind of followup editing. Why would you make the statement that you were avoiding using your IP? Why would it cross your mind to do logged out editing at all? That shows deceptive thinking. Also, you weren't  as it takes more work to create the accounts than it would to have simply used your main account for quick edits. You also created several accounts above to hold in reserve...you didn't use them for any editing at the time. Shows intent on your part...and frankly, there is something wrong with the notion that creating many accounts is normal behavior. It isn't and anyone trying to sell that idea shouldn't be trusted.

Orphaned non-free image File:Gradual Liquidation.ogg
Thanks for uploading File:Gradual Liquidation.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:31, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:PlaceReddit.PNG
Thanks for uploading File:PlaceReddit.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Good article reassessment notice
Place (Reddit) has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. &#123;{u&#124; Sdkb  }&#125;  talk 19:53, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Gradual Liquidation.ogg
Thanks for uploading File:Gradual Liquidation.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 26 June 2024 (UTC)