User talk:Waldemahr

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Wizard191 (talk) 13:22, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Thank you for the kind welcome!

I remain thankful for the helpful hints and if I will need help I will definitely ask for hints, Wizard191 !!! I do not know the contributors that initiated the "Metastability" article, we must be all grateful for the initiating work. Hopefully the altered introduction and the restructuring I applied to it will be easily accepted, my having done some years of research in metastable systems (proteins, atomic clusters).

I am certainly looking forward to seing this article further improved by other people working in the field !!!


 * Having been involved in condensed matter and nanoparticle projects and being a physicist I will stick to what I know. If contributing to the physics sections I will try and be as methodical, exhaustive and concise as possible when describing facts. I find that a lot of articles in the physics section are too long, have difficulty in arriving to the essence of things and so cannot stop and wonder that I may not be the first physicist trying to help - and how much resistance will there be... I will hope for the best.


 * More recently I studied heavy-duty biology, microbiology and some genetics. In those fields I am more introspect... But I feel I could contribute in discussion forums and with some of the biological macromolecules, especially proteins.


 * Speaking of the 5 pillars of Wikipedia I find if curious that professional knowledge is not one of the foremost mandatory conditions in arguing a point. It is one thing to be polite to each other and another thing to get lost in endless arguments about things we are not quite sure of, just because we are not ready to accept the authority of people that know their professional realities. Much time may be and possibly is wasted this way. You may take a look for yourself, the discussion tabs of the articles become way longer than the articles themselves !!!


 * I will not promise a ton of contributions but I feel that I may be able to help bringing some order and cohesion to the presented materials. As for writing my first article - some of the topics in physics have to be dramatically reorganized... This may take LONGER than starting from scratch. Will see what the future brings.

Speedy deletion nomination of Monomer clusters
A tag has been placed on Monomer clusters requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Eeekster (talk) 22:21, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

March 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Monomer clusters, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 23:00, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Deletion nomination of Talk:Microparticles
Hi Waldemahr, this is a message from an automated bot, regarding Talk:Microparticles. You blanked the page and, since you are its sole author, FrescoBot has interpreted it as a request for deletion of the page and asked administrators to satisfy the requests per speedy deletion criterion G7. Next time you want a page that you've created deleted, you can explicitly request the deletion by inserting the text. If you didn't want the page deleted, please remove the tag from the page and undo your blanking or put some content in the page. Admins are able to recover deleted pages. Please do not contact the bot operator for issues not related with bot's behaviour. To opt out of these bot messages, add somewhere on your talk page. -- FrescoBot  (msg) 00:23, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Your edits to Adsorption
Hi Waldemahr, and thanks for your contributions.

I've reverted your edits to Adsorption as there were several problems. You changed the definition without changing the citation, incorrectly making it appear as though www.brownfieldstsc.org supported the definition you provided. It's essential that if you change cited text you update the citation. Also there seemed to be problems with the definition you provided – the term "monomer" is normally used for a component of a polymer, and I don't believe it's essential for a film to be formed for a process to be called "adsorption".

Finally, please don't mark edits like that as minor. As described at Help:Minor edit, you should only mark edits as minor if they could not possibly be disputed, such as typo corrections or vandalism reversion. Edits that change meaning should never be marked as minor.

Thanks, Adrian J. Hunter(talk•contribs) 04:19, 22 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Again, you can't change a cited statement without changing the citation, as you did at Monomer . To do so is to introduce an error, as the article is implying that the cited source says something that it does not.


 * It's great that you are educated in the topics you wish to edit, but at Wikipedia content disputes are settled by citing sources, not by claiming superior authority. I'm challenging your claim in Adsorption  that molecules that adsorb to a surface are called monomers (I realise this will be true in certain cases, but I don't believe it's generally true); per Wikipedia policy described at WP:BURDEN, the onus is on you to provide a citation to support your claim.


 * Thank you, Adrian J. Hunter(talk•contribs) 16:47, 22 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Similarly, you changed the definition of Chemisorption to indicate that it is something different to adsorption rather than a type of adsorption, which is inconsistent with every source I can find, including this and many other sources found by entering "define:chemisorption" into Google, and presumably with the original cited source (to which I do not have access).  Adrian J. Hunter(talk•contribs) 17:08, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Embryonic heart
Could this article be merged into Heart development, or are they two separate things? S.G.(GH) ping! 17:09, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to  in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 20:04, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)