User talk:Wickey

Welcome!
Hello, Wickey, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:


 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Icewhiz (talk) 07:00, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

July 2018
Icewhiz (talk) 07:02, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Please note, that until you are WP:EXTENDEDCONFIRMED, you are not supposed to edit Arab-Israeli conflict related pages (see WP:ARBPIAINTRO) - you can post talk page comments, but not edit the article themselves.Icewhiz (talk) 07:02, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Laurie Magnus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jewish Board of Guardians ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Laurie_Magnus check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Laurie_Magnus?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Previous account
Are you the same person as User:Wickey-nl?--Shrike (talk) 15:48, 12 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Wickey: I also require you to answer this question. If you continue to ignore it, I may block your account.   AGK  &#9632;   13:23, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

AE
-- Shrike (talk) 12:28, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Edits on Israeli-Palestinian articles
If it is not clear per Arbitration/Index/Palestine-Israel articles: "accounts with fewer than 500 edits, and accounts with less than 30 days tenure are prohibited from editing any page that could be reasonably construed as being related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. This prohibition is preferably enforced by the use of extended confirmed protection, but where that is not feasible, it may also be enforced by reverts, page protections, blocks, the use of pending changes, and appropriate edit filters." As you account is fewer that 500 edits you not allowed to edit I/P articles. Shrike (talk) 13:51, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

October 2018
I am not the loser. I can use my time for better things. The only losers are the readers of this distorted censored Wikipedia, and WP itself.

You still need to address the issues raised during arbitration enforcement. Nobody's going to unblock you if you are unwilling to do this. --Yamla (talk) 15:42, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
 * That was really a poor arbitration. What other than the above reason you need? Wickey (talk) 15:52, 24 April 2019 (UTC)


 * See WP:TBAN: "Unless clearly and unambiguously specified otherwise, a topic ban covers all pages (not only articles) broadly related to the topic, as well as the parts of other pages that are related to the topic". Huon (talk) 14:01, 26 April 2019 (UTC)


 * That is looking retrospectively. Can you also look forward? Wickey (talk) 14:14, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

Talk page access revoked for your violation of WP:NPA. We've wasted enough time here, this is pointless. --Yamla (talk) 10:00, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

UTRS 46548
is now open. for unblock discussion. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 20:48, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
 * , I can't access the appeal.  Sandstein   21:34, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Oh, sorry to see that. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 22:13, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm having trouble following it. They deny abusing the accounts, though I guess from the block log, they violated a topic ban with one or the other or both. Not really clear. Yamla's OK with unblocking if they want to edit with this account only.  stopped being blocked long ago. Above they appear to have confused this account on NLWIKI with User:Wickey-nl.  -- Deep fried okra  ( talk ) 22:45, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
 * They should understand that they still tbanned from the I/P conflict. Shrike (talk) 04:34, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
 * , without seeing the unblock request I must object to any unblock. The conduct above illustrates the reasons for the block.  Sandstein   07:48, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Thanks. FWIW, the ysytem should give you access via the OAuth thing. Sorry it didn't work. Maybe AmandaNP can sign you up. Mooted for now. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 08:29, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

UTRS 46728

 * has been opened. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 09:28, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Noting user admits to being User:Wickey-nl and wishes this account unblocked and wishes to edit with one account. Noting user is aware of ARBPIA WP:1RR and TBAN Noting Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive155 Please see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Wickey -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 12:58, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Wickey/Wickey-nl was previously given an AE topic ban, and later blocked as a sockpuppet. The sockpuppet blocks treated User:Wickey-nl as the master, giving that account a temp block, and this one an indef block. The temp block has long since expired. As per this user's several UTRS requests, I will consider this account to be their master, unblock it, and re-block the other account instead.
 * , be advised that you are topic banned as an arbitration enforcement action from the topic of the Arab-Israeli conflict, see Special:Permalink/625025912. This prohibition applies not just in article space but in all namespaces, for any activity described by the topic ban. If you violate this ban, you will likely be blocked again. You can only appeal this topic ban at WP:AN, WP:AE, or WP:ARCA. ST47 (talk) 05:34, 14 August 2021 (UTC)


 * has been closed. -- Deep fried okra  ( talk ) 05:47, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

NCG
Please note that disambiguation pages like : are meant to help readers find a specific existing article quickly and easily. For that reason, they have guidelines that are different from articles. From the Disambiguation dos and don'ts you should:


 * Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
 * Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
 * Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry that mentions the title being disambiguated
 * Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
 * Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
 * Do not insert external links or references - Wikipedia is not a business directory

There should be an article on Nuclear Consulting Group! But currently there is barely a mention and no indication that it is known as NCG.

Thank you. Leschnei (talk) 13:26, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

EPR (nuclear reactor)
You keep adding a sentence in the section "New Model" EPR design. However, the sentence is not related to the "New Model" EPR design. Instead, it deals with the original design. If you think that the sentence is important, please move it to a suitable place in the article. --TuomoS (talk) 14:12, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
 * The source is of 2016 and it is in the right period and section. And if you want to discuss, please go to the talk page, not here. --Wickey (talk) 17:23, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

December 2021
Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. ''Your move of Fukushima nuclear disaster was disruptive and it has caused alot of issues when trying to swap. Don't move the talk page if you can't move the main article Megan B....   It’s all coming to me'' till the end of time  17:45, 20 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Actually, the article had a hidden move protection and the move of the talkpage gave a misleading option-list, suggesting that I could move the article. Instead it moved the talkpage itself, which could not be completely reversed. Fortunately, you solved it excellently. --Wickey (talk) 10:30, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Ohh I see, please disregard the notice above. Cheers :) Megan B....   It’s all coming to me till the end of time  15:51, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Important Notice
Doug Weller talk 10:44, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

Labelling someone as "British-Jewish" was not appropriate
Ignoring the fact that Bat Ye'or's article doesn't use that label, if people want to know more about her they can read her article. We would rarely label someone British-some religion. Doug Weller talk 12:23, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I do not entirely understand what the problem is. "British-Jewish", albeit spelled as "British Jewish", is not uncommon at all. https://www.google.com/search?q=British-Jewish&num=50


 * The Bat Ye'or's article does explicitly mention that she is Jewish and it explaines the background of the conspiracy. --Wickey (talk) 14:32, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I've raised the issue at WT:BLP. Doug Weller  talk 15:09, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Sure, I appreciate assuming good faith. --Wickey (talk) 15:51, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Hopefully you're being serious. That's why I asked at BLPN. Doug Weller  talk 16:48, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I am serious. --Wickey (talk) 17:05, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I didn’t know about your topic ban. You cannot participate in any relevant discussions so you are violating your topic ban. No problem so long as you stop now. Doug Weller  talk 18:41, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I self-revered just to avoid this. You did not revert my edit, but raised the topic again instead. I do not blame you for doing that. I don't think discussing this principal policy aspect on the BLP platform is a violation of the topic ban. Nevertheless I distance myself immediately from this subject. --Wickey (talk) 10:44, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

Questions on Nuclear Reactors
If you would like to get your questions answered, I suggest the forum Renewable vs Nuclear Debate. David MacQuigg 02:41, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Wickey. Thank you for your work on Schedules of substances annexed to the Chemical Weapons Convention. User:Graeme Bartlett, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:10, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Yes, I am sure it is distinct and is a useful addition to the subject. --Wickey (talk) 11:23, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)