User talk:Wikiedro

Mark Geiger
Hi. I see you restored the 2018 Fifa section. When doing such edits please do not mark them as minor. Also there has been discussion on the page that this is undue. I will tag it for now and wait for your explanation on the talk on how this does not violate WP:BLP or WP:Undue. You may like to note that currently there is consensus that this information does not belong on List of 2018 FIFA World Cup controversies and it is even less appropriate at the biographical article. AIRcorn (talk) 06:16, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Patagonia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Osorno ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Patagonia check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Patagonia?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

Noticed a few of your recent contributions
Hi, I see that you've made some recent edits that I'm curious about. Feel free to email me if you'd like to help me understand a bit more. HueyXocoatzin (talk) 04:20, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Perfecto, señáleme su correo. En cuanto a génetica mexicana el usuario Pob3qu3 ha ocultado muchos estudios que sí están expuestos en Wikipedia en español. Saludos. Wikiedro (talk) 15:57, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
 * My email is ericandre311@gmail.com. We'll continue there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HueyXocoatzin (talk • contribs) 03:35, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

SPI Notice
I write to tell you that I've requested a Sockpuppet investigation on which you are heavily involved. Pob3qu3 (talk) 04:33, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 15:29, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Estimado, antes de revertir revise las referencias en español que revisé. Las cifras señaladas no se mencionan en ningún lado. Y en el resumen de edición señalé con enlace y número de página las cifras que sí se aportan. Saludos. Wikiedro (talk) 17:04, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

March 2019
I noticed that you have posted comments in a language other than English. At the English-language Wikipedia, we try to use English for all comments. Posting all comments in English makes it easier for other editors to join the conversation and help you. If you cannot avoid using another language, then please provide a translation into English, if you can. If you cannot provide a translation, please go to the list of Wikipedias, look in the list for a Wikipedia that is in your language, and edit there instead of here. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. Cordless Larry (talk) 17:19, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
 * At Talk:White Latin Americans it sounds like you are promising to edit war:
 * The Google Translator says this means "Post: I warn Dhtwiki, that after the official 24 hours to avoid including the rules of reversal, I will continue reversing until I return the consensus base point, which is 13-24M, and not 56M,.." As I stated at WP:AN3 I am planning to block your account for edit warring. There may still be time for you to avoid sanctions if you reply at the noticeboard and promise to withdraw from the entire topic area. See my comment there. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 13:35, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Hola. El área temática es de mi interés. El problema que observo es que yo propongo evitar exponer en el artículo datos polémicos y/o volátiles, y a cambio propongo exponer datos en cifras que están en el piso base de consenso, mientras que la contraparte desea mantener esos datos polémicos porque es lo que existía, y que según yo son los datos que generan esta guerra de ediciones, entre varios usuarios.
 * Puedo desistir de revertir de forma consecutiva, o de revertir en general, pero ojo, que ellos también revierten mis contribuciones sin siquiera recibir mención a su actuar (que en principio es equivalente a la mía), y sin siquiera responder a las diferencias mayúsculas que yo y otros usuarios hemos manifestado en la discusión del artículo sobre dichos datos, incluso mostrando la sobreinterpretación de las referencias, y la falta de sustento real en las mismas (referencias que están en español). Esto hace que simplemente porque existía un dato en el artículo (sin tener un correcto sustento bibliográfico) lo estén dando por correcto, cuando no necesariamente es así. Luego lo sostienen porque su existencia anterior es supuestamente el status quo. No obstante, la propia guerra de ediciones y la dilatada discusión del artículo sobre el mismo caso, al menos en los últimos dos años, acusan que en realidad muy poco está consensuado, y que la mantención que se le está dando al artículo poco ayuda a la estabilidad del mismo. Por ello tengo en interés de atraer miradas de la moderación en inglés (especialmente aquella que sepa español), para que tome cartas en el asunto, y entre todos resolvamos diplomáticamente este asunto, quizás con una mediación o revisión por pares.
 * Yo lo que menos quiero es que la Wikipedia esté aportando datos de dudosa calidad y procedencia al usuario visitante ocasional, y precisamente en un tema como este, que siempre es sensible, es donde más intereses creados hay, y que son necesarios de contrarrestar, por lo que de alguna forma, la discusión global es necesaria y urgente (no solamente de los que se otorgan el derecho de vigilar). En caso contrario, pediré equivalencia, es decir, si yo no puedo editar en una temática en específico, pediré que los usuarios que me revierten, reciban el mismo efecto, al cabo, la polémica nunca se suscita de un solo lado. Saludos. --Wikiedro (talk) 14:30, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Yo lo que menos quiero es que la Wikipedia esté aportando datos de dudosa calidad y procedencia al usuario visitante ocasional, y precisamente en un tema como este, que siempre es sensible, es donde más intereses creados hay, y que son necesarios de contrarrestar, por lo que de alguna forma, la discusión global es necesaria y urgente (no solamente de los que se otorgan el derecho de vigilar). En caso contrario, pediré equivalencia, es decir, si yo no puedo editar en una temática en específico, pediré que los usuarios que me revierten, reciban el mismo efecto, al cabo, la polémica nunca se suscita de un solo lado. Saludos. --Wikiedro (talk) 14:30, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Adressing a Problematic User
Hey, it's me again. I don't think you emailed me those few months ago. I saw your edits in an article about Chile and remembered this debacle between Pob3qu3 and Wikipedia. Shoot me an email if you want some pointers on how to address the disagreement on the demographics of Mexico. HueyXocoatzin (talk) 06:33, 16 July 2019 (UTC)HueyXocoatzin

Disambiguation link notification for April 29
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
 * Chile Open (tennis)
 * added a link pointing to David Carter
 * Spain
 * added a link pointing to Toledo

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

May 2021
EpicPupper (talk) 18:03, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

German descendants in Mexico
On the Germans talk page Wikiedro, Rsk6400 explained that Canal Once is not a primary source, but rather a secondary or tertiary source as explained there WP:PSTS. You clearly don’t seem to really understand the differences between different sources until you read and realize that Canal Once. When you look at Italian immigration to Mexico, the number of Italian Mexicans has a source that came from Canal Once and why can’t you just keep the 2 million German Mexicans there. So I kindly ask you to stop removing the 2 million estimate that I added on German Mexicans. See Germans talk page for what he had told you. --Pumpoviro (talk) 16:01, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Is secondary source, but doesn't indicate sources in German section, diferent to other sections, case of Italians. In parallel, don't exist references in web, books & others with there numbers in German section. verified references traditionally fluctuate between 15,000-40,000 and 100,000 for German descendants in Mexico (with mennonites), 2 million is a dissonant number and not mentioned in other references. Wikiedro (talk) 16:28, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)