User talk:Wikiinger

Template edits
Hello Wikiinger, I see you made edits to a bunch of Radeon graphics card templates. Thanks for the work. May I make one minor suggestion. As templates are often used across multiple articles, maybe rather than removing the API support (which may or may not be in the articles), summarize it to a footnote of the article. Thoughts? Thanks for the hard work. Dbsseven (talk) 23:11, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks, for the kind words. Regarding the API, would you mind responding here:Talk:List of AMD graphics processing units (This way the discussion takes place in a central place and transparent to the other users). Then I will also respond to your suggestion. :-) Wikiinger (talk) 23:33, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
 * I see you have also turned the Ryzen templates upside down. Would you mind explaining why, when other processor table templates have the higher end products at the top and the entry level components at the bottom? 83.104.249.240 (talk) 19:42, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Because they don't??? see List of AMD accelerated processing unit microprocessors, List of AMD FX microprocessors, List of AMD graphics processing units, etc ... Wikiinger (talk) 13:08, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
 * You haven't done the job properly though. You just moved, for example, the Ryzen 3 block above the Ryzen 5 block. The individual SKUs in each block are still in the original order. So, for example, the R3 1200 is below the R3 1300X when it ought to be at the very top of the table. So now it looks a mess. In case you suggest I fix it myself, my answer is that I would prefer to revert it to how it was before. It would then be in line with the equivalent templates for the various Intel processor families and there are more of those than AMD ones. 83.104.249.240 (talk) 17:55, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Meanwhile the two Epyc templates are unchanged with the more capable products at the top. 83.104.249.240 (talk) 19:31, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Well, it is Wikipedia - the wiki that anyone can edit! (hint, hint) ... Wikiinger (talk) 17:34, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
 * No. I said my preference would be to revert but I can't due to other edits that have been made since yours. Any change has to be done manually and I can't be bothered to spend the time and care necessary. I don't enjoy editing tables. 83.104.249.240 (talk) 16:45, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Template:AMD custom APU
Recently a Zen based custom APU has been added to the template, which IMO when looking at the template name is alright. However it causes conflict with one of the editors of the Jaguar article, who reverted the Zen APU twice. &mdash; Pizzahut2 (talk) 23:51, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

Opened a discussion section here: Template talk:AMD custom APU &mdash; Pizzahut2 (talk) 00:16, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

Floating navbar
Disadvantage is that a table might not use the full width of a page, in which case the navbar isn't attached to the table. Template:AMD Epyc 3000 series is relatively slim so it can be used for testing.--Pizzahut2 (talk) 16:39, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Also when trying to attach the navbar to the right border of the table, it will be out of sight if the right side of the table doesn't fit into the browser window.--Pizzahut2 (talk) 18:47, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

How about this, no navbar in the articles, but a link which is only visible when viewing the template? --Pizzahut2 (talk) 19:54, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Template:AMD Epyc 3000 series/sandbox
 * Kinda different issues...


 * 1) The visual edit never worked for me. However I like the idea to display the visual edit only on the template page.  However the V.T.E should be accessible (but subtle) on the article page since it is really handy.
 * 2) About the floating navbar. I guess there should be some CSS vodoo to align it with the right side of the table? Another possibility might be to create an empty white row and place the navbar in there?
 * PS: I would prefer to have these discussion on the article page (best candidate is List_of_AMD_graphics_processing_units), since this way other editors can chime in. Wikiinger (talk) 20:33, 23 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Added discussion there.--Pizzahut2 (talk) 12:19, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

"The visual edit never worked for me." - Did you disable the new wikitext mode when you tried? "Automatically enable all new beta features" must be disabled as well, else disabling anything doesn't have an effect. And clicking this link still doesn't work then? Maybe it depends on the browser. Officially, the VE is meant to be disabled for templates, thus there's just an "edit source" link at top.--Pizzahut2 (talk) 20:08, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Ok, sorry, but  is a uncommon-using template? Maybe this form will be able to broke some functionality or something else? Sorry for my non-compitency question. 95.154.157.20 (talk) 23:13, 25 January 2019 (UTC) as you encounter them, though preferably as a part of a more substantive edit." sometimes broke some of my personal scripts works.)
 * The reason is mentioned here: WP:LINEBREAK, e.g.:
 * "While forms without the / (such as  and   ) will work properly in the rendered page, they break several of the available syntax highlighters for wikicode in the editing view, and so should be avoided. Please correct occurrences to
 * hth. Wikiinger (talk) 16:29, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Greatly thanks. Maybe i will now use clear  on my personal testing pages only (because

Also, unpretending offtopic request: can you help me to update, moderate or give a mention advice about this template (here a test page with working template)?95.154.157.20 (talk) 18:11, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Sorry, can't help you there. You can try WP:IRCHELP. Wikiinger (talk) 17:15, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Anyway, thanks for all tips! 95.154.157.20 (talk) 03:27, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

is not anyhow related to PHP7. It's an remnant of an old XHTML that was in use sometime ago. But now it's HTML5. It doesn't break anything. At least no examples are given. That's a standard. With HTML5 is acceptable, but now preferred. Elk Salmon (talk) 09:17, 21 June 2019 (UTC
 * Who said it is related to PHP7? Anyhow the "br" discussion is an ever ongoing discussion, in addition to WP:LINEBREAK see also WP:Village_pump_(technical). To me it doesn't look like WP will reach a consensus soon. So I'd suggest to leave it in the articles just as it is or sticking to WP:LINEBREAK. Wikiinger (talk) 09:50, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Deprodding of Comparison of Radeon RX 5700 models
I have removed the tag from Comparison of Radeon RX 5700 models, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add back to the page. Instead, feel free to list it at Articles for deletion. Thanks! -- intgr [talk] 18:14, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Please respond to the Zen3 Image-Request, otherwise the images will be deleted
Please reply on Commons:Commons:Graphic_Lab/Illustration_workshop, otherwise I will delete my uploaded images due to possible Copyright-Violation. — Johannes  Kalliauer  - contrib. 01:15, 5 June 2022 (UTC)


 * @JoKalliauer I will upload it on en:wikipedia. Please keep it so long, thanks! Wikiinger (talk) 09:56, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:AMD Zen 3 logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:AMD Zen 3 logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Denniss (talk) 08:12, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)