User talk:Wikijeff


 * Archive

Ignatz Lichtenstein
Can you provide a reliable source for your additions to Ignatz Lichtenstein's bibliography. As the article points out, he is often confused another rabbi from Budapest. I'll give you sometime to reply as you are not a frequent contributor, but if this is just some list you found on the web it is very likely incorrect, so I am anxious to revert you. -- Kendrick7talk 21:47, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * You seem to know more about this than I do; pardon my overcaution. -- Kendrick7talk 01:37, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Nah, I'm not particularly religious, and as a supersessionist, Jews are just another religious minority as far as I am concerned, admitted one that has the Bomb, and (a handful of whom) pushes their POV a little too much for my taste on the wikipedia. But good luck! -- Kendrick7talk 05:05, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

re:need help of Harvard student
I'm in Mexico for the summer, and can't actually think off-hand of anyone I know who is spending the summer in Cambridge. So I don't think I can help you until at earliest mid-September. Maybe there's another Wikipedian who can get at Harvard microfilms? --jacobolus (t) 01:07, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Messianic artices
Please don't take this message as canvasing for your vote. I write to u in hopes that u can clarify this problem, since some claims are surfacing that a particular organization isn't notable enough, i, as an orthodox Jew, am not familiar with its issue, and thus could not testify to this regards, Please be so kind to shed your knowledge on this. Thanks.--יודל 12:46, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Also if u can clarify if Stuart Dauermann is notable?--יודל 23:40, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Shraga Hager
Hi, there is currently a discussion about the notability of Rabbi Shraga Hager your insight on this would greatly be appreciated. Have a beautiful day--יודל 13:10, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Ichthus: January 2012
 In this issue...

- Ichthus is published by WikiProject Christianity For submissions and subscriptions contact the Newsroom
 * From the Editor
 * What are You doing For Lent?
 * Fun and Exciting Contest Launched
 * Spotlight on WikiProject Catholicism

Speedy deletion nomination of Armory (software)


A tag has been placed on Armory (software) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 17:02, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Armory (software) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Armory (software) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Armory (software) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Velella  Velella Talk 13:01, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)