User talk:Wikipeep 494

Counter?
Just swipe the code, EG. " 95 Wikipedia users want 68.39.174.238 to get an account. ". They key is obviously the "class="usermessage"" part. 68.39.174.238 19:03, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Article assessments
I noticed you have added assessments to some biography articles. There is a formal process for designating articles as Good articles, which involves more than just tagging articles with that rating. Articles such as Lloyd Owusu do not meet Good article standards yet, since it has zero references among other issues. Take a look at Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment for more details on the assessment levels. --Aude (talk) 18:07, 18 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Talk:Murali Kartik is a good article, as noted on the talk page as well as in the WP India and WP Cricket boxes on the talk page. I'm sure WikiProject Biography needs help in assessing articles, but I suggest having someone there explain more about how they do it and help you out. I'm not involved in the process, so don't know 100% how they do things either, except that I'm aware of how good articles work.  With some help from them, I'm sure you will quickly learn and be a help to them. `--Aude (talk) 18:20, 18 June 2007 (UTC)


 * I left a message at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Biography/Assessment. Someone who is more knowledgeable (than myself) can help explain more about how assessments are done. Thanks. --Aude (talk) 18:26, 18 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Yes, articles need to be nominated for Good article status. There are specific criteria that articles must meet to be designated good articles.  There are also standards expected for B-class articles, and lesser requirements for start-class as outlined on WikiProject_Biography/Assessment. --Aude (talk) 18:35, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

:)
I thought I was the only wikipedian that's 13 years old and has to use a slow 5 year old computer... Anyways, if you're confused with any of the assessment procedures just leave a note on my talk page about it and I'll try to answer it as soon as possible. -- Psych  less   14:21, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Okay, I'll go through each one and explain it as well as I can...


 * FA – To get this rating an article must meet the Featured Article criteria. It has to be nominated for FA status at the featured article candidates page. There, people either support or oppose the nomination, usually leaving comments if they oppose. To show you the hell of getting an article to FA see this nomination.
 * A – This is a step above GA and easier to get than FA. It has to go through an A-class review. More information on this can be found here. Articles are generally Good Articles before they get A class.
 * GA – Easier version of FA. It has to meet the Good article criteria. It has to be nominated for GA status, then a person will look over the article and either pass it, fail it, or put it on hold if the changes needed can be made in a timely manner. More info on this can be found here.
 * B – This is the highest rating you can give an article without formal review. A B article covers the subject well, it's a decent article. An article should have references to get this rating, but it doesn't have to.
 * Start – Article looks like it's still under construction. Probably has no references and gaps of information. e.g. An article on a soccer player covers his soccer career well but doesn't talk about his early and personal life.
 * Stub – Barely a paragraph long that talks briefly about what they were most famous for. If it's very short and has references, it's still a stub. Here's two stub articles: Jakub Wujek and Maxim Jakubowski. If it's full of lists that don't really tell much about the person it's still a stub. See Jakup Mato.

I hope this helped clarify things. It probably isn't completely necessary to put the "this article can be improved..." thing on every talk page. I personally don't think it really helps anyone but if you think it does then you can ignore me :). Regards,  Psych  less   18:09, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

One year younger....
Anyway, I'm just 11. I'm younger than you in only ONE YEAR.......camille32 12:38, 25 June 2007 (UTC)User_talk:Camille32 20:45, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Wikimedia Pennsylvania
Hello there!

I'm writing to inform you that we are now forming the first local Wikimedia Chapter in the United States: Wikimedia Pennsylvania. Our goals are to perform outreach and fundraising activities on behalf of the various Wikimedia projects. If you're interested in being a part of the chapter, or just want to know more, you can:
 * Contact us on IRC at #wikimedia-pa
 * Join our mailing list
 * Visit our blog at http://wmfpa.blogspot.com

Thanks and I hope you join up!  Cbrown1023   talk   04:52, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Up for deletion
Hey, Allentown, PA in popular culture is up for deletion. Please see the notice on the article page for link to chime in with your feedback. Obviously, please oppose deletion. Alphageekpa 18:29, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

League of Copyeditors roll call
Melon ‑ Bot  ( STOP! )  17:52, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Pennsylvania
Hi Wikipeep 494. You currently have yourself listed as a participant in the Pennsylvania WikiProject. If you are still active in the project then ignore this message. However if you are busy or no longer wish to be involved, please remove yourself from the list so we can get an updated count on the number of active members. Thank you! Monobi (talk) 19:42, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Express-Times
Hey Wikipeep, my name's Colin, I'm a reporter with the Express-Times in Easton. I am looking to write a story about local Lehigh Valleyians who edit Wikipedia on a frequent basis (or people from outside the area who edit Lehigh Valley-related articles) and looking at your userpage and contributions, you look like you'd be the perfect person for me to talk to. (I had thought of this idea last summer but never was able to write it, so if I've approached you about this before, I apologize). I was wondering if you wouldn't mind speaking to me for my story? I'm hoping to write it this weekend or next week, so if you could contact me ASAP I'd very much appreciate it. You can call me at my work number at 610-258-7171 ex3567 or email me at cmcevoy@express-times.com and let me know the best way to get in touch with you. Looking forward to speaking with you! Cam0927 (talk) 16:49, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

List of Billboard Hot 100 top 10 singles in 1998
Hey. I noticed that you started the page of List of Billboard Hot 100 top 10 singles in 2012 and have been updating it. Any chance that you could start the List of Billboard Hot 100 top 10 singles in 1998 page? Lttljvd promised me he would set it up, but I don't think he is coming back. If you could do this for me, I would really appreciate it. We both agreed that he would at least go up to 1998, Arjoccolenty (talk) 03:54, 7 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Hello, yes, I can definitely try! I don't think I can do it in one go but I can definitely do it in bits and pieces. --Wikipeep 494 (talk) 04:02, 7 April 2012 (UTC)


 * How far along are you? Reply to me when you get the message please. Arjoccolenty (talk) 14:03, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Philippine WikiCon
You are invited to the 3rd Philippine Wiki Conference (WikiCon) on May 26, 2012 9am-1pm at the co.lab.exchange in Pasig City. Please fill this form should you signify interest. --Exec8 (talk) 17:45, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Wikipeep 494/List of Hot 100 number-one singles of the 2000s (U.S.)


A tag has been placed on User:Wikipeep 494/List of Hot 100 number-one singles of the 2000s (U.S.) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 20:23, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

2019 US Banknote Contest
Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)