User talk:WilhelmSchneider

Bass music discussion
Can you point me to the discussion that supported your move of what had been at Bass music? Thanks and best, Barkeep49 (talk) 17:18, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Of course: Talk:UK_bass. I'm sorry if you dissaprove of my actions. My suggestion really was undisputed on the talk page for 6 days, which is quite a fair time. And, just to add one more argument to the ones I gave on the talk page: If you look at the editing history, the original article "Bass music" was all about Miami bass, which is obviously another proof that the term "bass music" is ambiguous and shouldn't be used as if it weren't. Best regards, WilhelmSchneider (talk) 19:32, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Didn't disapprove just didn't see it. Thanks for pointing it out to me. I missed it in the middle of the talk page. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 19:45, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Okay! :) WilhelmSchneider (talk) 20:10, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Pile of charlie
Hey. What I meant was, the pile of coke pictured had no direct relevance to the text in that section. If it had said in the caption "pile of coke from disco bust circa 1975" or something of the like I would get why it was included but just to have a pic of some random charlie doesn't bring anything encyclopedic to the table and if you want to see a pile of coke the article or your dealer would probably be your best bet. Don't want to war over this either but also wanted you to understand my reason. Your thoughts?  Rob van  vee  16:32, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks for explaining, I see the good will! I do think it has encyclopedic value to have an image of it in the article, at least not less than any other image already there. A reader should not have to visit a drug dealer to see this. But as I said, I don't want to start a battle, so if you insist despite my arguments, I won't give you a hard time. WilhelmSchneider (talk) 16:39, 4 July 2020 (UTC)