User talk:Wk muriithi

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.

Here are some tips to help you get started:


 * To sign your posts (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type &#126;&#126;&#126; (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (4 tildes).
 * Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
 * If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk
 * Follow the Simplified Ruleset
 * Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
 * Remember Neutral point of view
 * Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Good luck!

New Media for a New Millennium (NM2)
You asked about this on Wikipedia_talk:Help. You should probably mention this on the Village Pump; it'll get more notice. JesseW 02:50, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)

American Technology Research
Apologies, but your recent article on American Technology Research was a speedy deletion candidate under criterion #3. By having only a single line and then an external link to the company's website, it qualified as advertising/spam. I appreciate that such might not have been your intent or desire and hope that you'll feel free to give it another shot, if you believe that the company is notable and will be sought by researchers and that it can be discussed. Geogre 16:15, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Tyco
1,000 acquisitions? Are you sure? Could you cite me to an authority for that? I'm the person who wrote in the "200 acquisitions" figure. I did so based on a statement on p. 72 of Roger Lowenstein's book, Origins of the Crash (2004). --Christofurio 00:27, Nov 27, 2004 (UTC) I see, i came accross that info today when i was reading "Crafting and Executing strategy 14th edition" by Arthur A. Thompson Jr. page 252. I also found it hard to believe, mainly because i feel books published by McGraw-Hill are terribly useless. I would however not object with reverting back to 200 companies, but be aware that someone felt that they have acquired 1000 companies and there may be truth in that. Please send back a note so that i can know whether you got this message Muriithi

Thanks for the note. I've added the phrase "by some accounts" before the 1,000 number just to let people know there's room for dispute. Anyone who is made curious by that can now go to the Talk page and see each of our references. --Christofurio 17:10, Nov 27, 2004 (UTC)

Yeah, i agree that is the best way to solve it gathima 17:38, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing
Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
 * Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
 * Multi-Licensing Guide
 * Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the " " template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:


 * Option 1
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR
 * Option 2
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions to any U.S. state, county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace " " with "  ". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Thomas Joseph Mboya
I moved your article at Mboya, Thomas Joseph to Thomas Joseph Mboya. This is the standard naming convention at Wikipedia. Your redirect is no longer necessary. Thank you. I have no problem with that.

News links
Hi Wk. I saw your external links on malaria and tuberculosis. There is a big problem with posting news articles links on Wikipedia. Often, the articles are inaccurate or poorly sourced. When it comes to medical articles, the news is often preceded by (or coincides with) a very similar report in the medical professional literature. For Wikipedia, I would be strongly in favour of citing these professional reports rather then newsworthy spinoffs. JFW | T@lk  20:46, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)


 * I have responded on my talk page. JFW | T@lk  22:18, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Adding new definitions
I have dealt with your addition to shed by creating a disambiguation page. Normally I would have said that the 'casting off' definition is just a dictionary definition, and so is not strictly relevant to Wikipedia, and would be better suited to Wiktionary. However, there was a link from acne, and strangely none from snake, so I created the disambig page for the hell of it. Hope that this is OK with you. Noisy | Talk 22:18, Dec 19, 2004 (UTC)

Signing
Please sign your messages on talk pages. This is simple: type ~ and the wiki will insert your name and timestamp, like this: JFW | T@lk  19:59, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)

DSL history - source?
You added the following paragraph to the DSL page. It makes some claims that I haven't heard elsewhere. Could you add some sources for it(news reports, historical studies, etc.)? It's good writing, and interesting, but it needs to be sourced.

The paragraph: "Its origin dates back to 1988, when an engineer at Bell research lab deviced a way to carry digital signal over the unused frequency spectrum. This allows ordinary phone line to provide digital communication without blocking access to voice services. Bells management however were not enthusiastic about it as it was not as profitable as renting out a second line for those consumers who prefered to still have acess to the phone when dialing out. This however changed in the late 90s when cable companies started marketing broadband internet access. Realising that most consumers would prefer broadband over a second dial out line, Bell companies rushed out the DSL technology that they had been sitting on for the past decade as an attempt to slow broadband internet access uptake." - diff JesseW 19:52, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Signing your posts
Hi Wk, regarding your recent posts to Talk:Rachel Corrie, could you please sign your posts to talk pages in future? I see JFW has already explained that you do this by typing four tildes after your post. See Sign your posts on talk pages for more details. Many thanks, SlimVirgin (talk) 21:27, Apr 18, 2005 (UTC)

User Categorisation
You were listed on the Wikipedians/Ontario page as living in or being associated with Ontario. As part of the User categorisation project, these lists are being replaced with user categories. If you would like to add yourself to the category that is replacing the page, please visit Category:Wikipedians in Ontario for instructions.--Rmky87 04:49, 10 October 2005 (UTC)

National Health Service
Thank you for pointing out the relative date problem on the NHS article, though it's considered bad practice to put pointers like that in the actual article text. The talk page would be a much better place, but even better would be to find the relevant fact yourself! Google is your friend in this respect. Cheers, - mholland 14:34, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

Wikimedia Canada
Hi there! I'd like to invite you to explore Wikimedia Canada, and create a list of people interested in forming a local chapter for our nation. A local chapter will help promote and improve the organization, within our great nation. We'd also like to encourage everyone to suggest projects for our national chapter to participate in. Hope to see you there!--DarkEvil 15:14, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

Gold
I was interested to see what you wrote in Talk:Renminbi re gold. I've just recently watched The Money Masters. Have you seen it? (I don't know whether what they say is accurate or not.) JohnGH 13:52, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

Lumumba (film)
Please see my comments concerning an article you created: Talk:The Rise and Violent Fall of Patrice Lumumba. --Mathew5000 18:59, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Philanthropist
I've added the "prod" template to the article Philanthropist, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Philanthropist. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. &mdash; Sebastian (talk) 03:44, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Nairobi fly1.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Nairobi fly1.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 08:08, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Nairobi fly1.JPG listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Nairobi fly1.JPG, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — MECU ≈ talk 01:06, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Please sign your messages on talk pages! Thank you!
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --Vlad|-> 09:04, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of National Association of Professional Organizers
National Association of Professional Organizers, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that National Association of Professional Organizers satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/National Association of Professional Organizers and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of National Association of Professional Organizers during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Russavia 08:33, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

bri encoding
What do you know about bri encoding? (Please respond on page Talk:B8ZS). --75.19.73.101 06:36, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

wikileaks
This is censorship, as they quite rightly state in their press release. I have added a section, feel free/help to incorporate. Pnd (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 00:27, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

David C. McClelland
A tag has been placed on David C. McClelland, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to a nonexistent page.

If you can fix this redirect to point to an existing Wikipedia page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you also fix the redirect. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Anonymous101 (talk) 15:36, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of José Maurício Bustani‎


The article José Maurício Bustani‎ has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. L.tak (talk) 21:01, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Cisco Unified Provisioning Manager for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cisco Unified Provisioning Manager is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Cisco Unified Provisioning Manager until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. 65.242.18.131 (talk) 11:14, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:48, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Chiroscience


The article Chiroscience has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of 'This article meets criteria A and B because...' and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 10:26, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pinhalense


A tag has been placed on Pinhalense requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 23:34, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Korea Fund


The article Korea Fund has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline nor the more detailed Notability (companies) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of 'This article meets criteria A and B because...' and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 02:51, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of SkyLink Aviation for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SkyLink Aviation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/SkyLink Aviation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 17:20, 8 January 2024 (UTC)