User talk:WordSeventeen/Archive 4

Today's articles for improvement weekly vote



 * Hello WordSeventeen:


 * This week's voting for TAFI's upcoming weekly collaborations has begun at Week 28 of 2015. Thanks for participating!

Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 20:47, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Today's articles for improvement weekly vote



 * Hello WordSeventeen:


 * This week's voting for TAFI's upcoming weekly collaborations has begun at Week 29 of 2015. Thanks for participating!

Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 00:47, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Today's articles for improvement weekly vote



 * Hello WordSeventeen:


 * This week's voting for TAFI's upcoming weekly collaboration has begun at Week 26 of 2015. Thanks for participating!

Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 05:47, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Today's articles for improvement weekly vote



 * Hello WordSeventeen:


 * This week's voting for TAFI's upcoming weekly collaborations has begun at Week 27 of 2015. Thanks for participating!

Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 19:59, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

May 2015
This is your only warning; if you purposefully and blatantly harass a fellow Wikipedian again, as you did at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gabucho181, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi  13:18, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent harrassment of other editors. Your behaviour at the ANI thread and at the pianist article was bad enough, but raising another SPI despite it already being explained to you that the editors were not related is frankly the final straw on this one. Take some time out to reflect on how you should be editing a collegial project.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. Black Kite (talk) 13:20, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Angie Littlefield


A tag has been placed on Angie Littlefield requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — cocomonkilla | talk | contrib 23:56, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

WP:ANI
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:00, 27 May 2015 (UTC)


 * @WordSeventeen: I had to revert your edit at WP:ANI because it somehow duplicated nearly all the page. To add a new section, please click "new section" at the top of the page. Questions can be asked at WP:HELPDESK. Johnuniq (talk) 12:42, 27 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Thanks Johnuniq I was having some browser issues. Sorry for any inconvenience.  Cheers!     WordSeventeen (talk) 12:53, 27 May 2015 (UTC)


 * I am too busy to look into this (I am trying to get a lot of new articles from my sandboxes into article space before the 200th anniversary of the Battle of Waterloo). If you think there is a sockpuppet issue then use the appropriate process to have them investigated. -- PBS (talk) 07:09, 28 May 2015 (UTC)