User talk:Woshiyiweizhongguoren

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 19:11, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Because you thanked me
20:53, 11 April 2019 (UTC) ᴀɴᴏɴʏᴍᴜᴤᴤ ᴜᴤᴇʀ (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 20:02, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

April 2019
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Not here behaviour, obvious sock who is trolling us. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:18, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

I'm really confused. Woshiyiweizhongguoren (🇨🇳) 14:30, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
 * No, there is no mistake. This block was intentional on your first day you told us you were waiting to get autoconfirmed to publish an article, before asking something you clearly knew the answer to. This edit summary was nothing more than trolling us, as is this (I'm aware it's a humour page, but it contributes to a trend.) There is more, but I'm not going to overwhelm this page with diffs.You're basically daring us to try to figure out what your previous account was. It doesn't matter who you were before, you are an obvious sock who is taunting us to try to identify a master. We don't play those games. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:38, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
 * When asking Huon about the auto confirmed rights, I was just making sure that what I was thinking was accurate, to clear away any possible misconceptions. I don't get how the SPI and last topic pool diffs support the fact that I'm deceiving anybody. Never once have I ever implied the existence of prior accounts. Quite the opposite, in fact. I do not have the slightest intention to harm the encyclopedia, and in fact I try to prevent disruption by patrolling recent changes and random pages. Woshiyiweizhongguoren (🇨🇳) 15:18, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I’m aware you claim to be an IP who registered. I don’t believe you. TonyBallioni (talk) 15:24, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Opinions from others? <b style="color:#00205B">Woshiyiwei</b><b style="color:#0077C0">zhongguo</b><b style="color:#00205B">ren</b> (<b style="color:#0077C0">🇨🇳</b>) 15:30, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Admin help requests are not needed in this case, that's what the unblock template is for. People are getting very tired of this game.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 16:02, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I read your claims on my talk page, but they are unconvincing. I endorse this block. —DoRD (talk)​ 16:04, 11 April 2019 (UTC)


 * OK, I'll stop using admin help. I'm not trying to play games to fool the administrators, by the way.
 * On recent changes I see non-auto confirmed users "create" articles in their sandboxes or user pages. Does that make them socks? <b style="color:#00205B">Woshiyiwei</b><b style="color:#0077C0">zhongguo</b><b style="color:#00205B">ren</b> (<b style="color:#0077C0">🇨🇳</b>) 16:06, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

WP:DBQ <b style="color:#00205B">Woshiyiwei</b><b style="color:#0077C0">zhongguo</b><b style="color:#00205B">ren</b> (<b style="color:#0077C0">🇨🇳</b>) 16:06, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

That's it
Since nobody seems to agree that I'm welcome in this community anymore, goodbye. <b style="color:#00205B">Woshiyiwei</b><b style="color:#0077C0">zhongguo</b><b style="color:#00205B">ren</b> (<b style="color:#0077C0">🇨🇳</b>) 16:07, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

PS the original owner gave his account to me, I can do whatever I want with it. :D<b style="color:#00205B">Woshiyiwei</b><b style="color:#0077C0">zhongguo</b><b style="color:#00205B">ren</b> (<b style="color:#0077C0">🇨🇳</b>) 19:54, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
 * And with that, you've admitted to account compromise. I'll be requesting a lock at meta. TonyBallioni (talk) 19:55, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

I don't care


 * This user, on their 14th day of account creation, was able to ask a question at a recent RfA and even !vote in Support for the candidate ? There should be stronger minimum requirements to !vote at an RfA? Britishfinance (talk) 22:15, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I may not like the result sometimes, but the whole "consensus is important, number of votes is theoretically irrelevant" idea on enwiki (contrary, for example, to dewiki, where a vote is very strictly a vote) eliminates the need for such requirements. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:48, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I am in agreement on that and my understanding is that en-WP has never been about "hard" rules but always involved a degree of "consensus" around rules (e.g. why AfD is not run by a bot). However, my point here is why do we allow a 14-day old account register a !vote in what is a major community gathering that requires a material understanding of WP to register a useful opinion to help build a consensus.  On one hand, we have bureaucrats talking about downgrading !votes of experienced editors for various reasons, however, this character just seems to have slipped in with nobody noticing anything about them? We should require a minimum threshold of experience to participate in RfAs. Britishfinance (talk) 13:01, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
 * May I suggest this conversation take place literally anywhere but a globally locked LTA's talk page?Praxidicae (talk) 13:09, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

A page you started (Aiwowo) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Aiwowo.

User:Newslinger while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

—  Newslinger  talk   05:46, 12 July 2019 (UTC)