User talk:Wubslin

Welcome!
Hi Wubslin! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Drmies (talk) 22:14, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Stronger wine?
Hi Wubslin... I can't find anything evidential on Pliny's claims regarding the strength of Falernian wine. But come to think of it, was it a claim supposed to demonstrate "strength", or simply an observation? No more than that? I found one or two references to the value of testing with fire, but the claim that Roman wines were demonstrably higher in alcohol than modern wines seems to be based on that passage in Pliny, and only that. Any ideas? Haploidavey (talk) 16:12, 20 June 2022 (UTC)


 * My (non-expert) understanding is that the strength of modern wines is more-or-less as high as you can go with fermentation. Let me have a think about it. Wubslin (talk) 16:16, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Please see Talk:Ancient Rome and wine. Thanks for raising it here. Wubslin (talk) 17:36, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Aha. That makes sense, thank you. So as far as I can tell, claims of higher alcohol content in ancient Roman wines are based on 2 assumptions, both inexact: 1) It was so alcoholic that it was usually watered down for drinking: and 2) that Pliny's flammable wine can only be explained by its much higher alcohol content. Who knows. No modern, scientific source seems to have challenged this. Thanks for removing the problem! Haploidavey (talk) 17:55, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Not at all. Thanks again. --Wubslin (talk) 18:27, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

July 2022
Hello, I'm GoldMiner24. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Bournemouth School have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks.  GoldMiner24 Talk 16:03, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Hello, User:GoldMiner24. I think you are mistaken. Please look again. --Wubslin (talk) 16:04, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Yeah, sorry I've already undone my revert.  GoldMiner24 Talk 16:06, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Not at all, thanks for caring and for your speedy re-revert. --Wubslin (talk) 16:08, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Matt Tong alumni Bournemouth School
Hi, I note you undid an edit for this alumnus, partly because they are 'not notable'. Please explain.

The source by the way is me, as I was there, in the same year as him. Hishmacla (talk) 18:14, 10 February 2023 (UTC)