User talk:XMillennium94x

CL Top scorers
Right source.--79.44.43.195 (talk) 13:04, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Ok, you're right. I've fixed all tables for both competitions.--79.44.43.195 (talk) 13:28, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Tour de France secondary classification winners, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sam Bennett. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:46, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 23
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 Giro d'Italia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Giovanni Visconti.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Champions League
Order top scores into infobox by flag a-z.--Island92 (talk) 21:05, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Supercopa de España
The tournament features both finalists from the Copa del Rey and the remaining highest ranked teams from the La Liga season that are not qualified through the cup final.--Island92 (talk) 23:40, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Barcelona and Valencia qualified for last year's Supercopa not for being finalists but because they've won La Liga and Copa del Rey 2018-19, not like Athletic Bilbao and Real Sociedad, that are listed as finalists, this year that are considered finalists because 2019-20 Copa del Rey Final is still to be played on April 4th 2021. I believe that make much more sense that the semi-finalist listed first to be the one who lost to the winner.

I'm sorry but I couldn't find any other way to chat with you...


 * Yes, but Supercopa de España rules say that the tournament features both finalists from the Copa del Rey and the remaining highest ranked teams from the La Liga season that are not qualified through the cup final and we must follow this information. Real Sociedad were eliminated (13 January 2021) before Real Madrid (14 January 2021) so they go above.--Island92 (talk) 11:56, 18 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Ok then, but Valencia should be listed as Copa del Rey winners even if they want to list Barcelona as La Liga champions and Copa del Rey finalists, because a team that won a national cup deserves some "recognition" instead of being listed only as "finalists"


 * You're right, but into the official document about the rules of this competition published by RFEF it includes "finalist", not basing the qualification to the Super Cup about the best recognition.--Island92 (talk) 20:01, 18 January 2021 (UTC)


 * In the official document about 2020-21 Supercopa de España... About the 2019-20 edition (https://www.rfef.es/sites/default/files/bases_competiciones_de_ambito_estatal.pdf - page 6): "They got the right to participate the Copa del Rey winners and runners-up and La Liga champions and runners-up. (...)", so and according to the official document about 2019-20 edition, Valencia participate as 2018-19 Copa del Rey winners, Barcelona as 2018-19 La Liga champions, Atlético as 2018-19 La Liga runners-up and Real Madrid as 2018-19 La Liga thrid place.

About 2020-21 edition, the way they qualify is correct just because the 2019-20 Copa del Rey wasn't yet played like we already discuss


 * I read this - Si alguno de los finalistas de Copa del Rey se hubiera clasificado, también, en primer o segundo lugar del Campeonato de Liga de Primera División -.--Island92 (talk) 22:00, 18 January 2021 (UTC)


 * But next says that the "Copa del Rey clubs" keeps the spot they earn for that via (winners or runners-up of the Copa), so I don't know who give the "authorization" to approve that kind of things but be coherent with previous edition, even if it was played in a different format, I suggest that Valencia should be listed as winners and if they want to keep Barcelona as La Liga winner and Copa finalists it's fine but Valencia was qualified to be the winner, above from being finalist. Last edition rules give my point reason...


 * Ok. Let's report it into WikiProject Football so that users can reach a reliable and final decision about it.--Island92 (talk) 12:37, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Unexplained removal of citation
Hello, I'm HumanBodyPiloter5. I noticed that you recently removed content from 2021 French Grand Prix without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)