User talk:Xhaoz

Analog shutoff date
Greetings! I saw your edit here and you are correct. Please see my notice of 24 April 2009 on the article talk page. Thanks. --Thomprod (talk) 12:26, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Cheers
Just want to say thanks for reverting the vandalism over at my user page. - Chrism would like to hear from you 16:26, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Red Meets Blue Design
I saw the frustration you had with Red Meets Blue Design, you might be able to use these,, ,, template warnings for users removing speedy deletion tags from their own articles. Good luck... ttonyb1 (talk) 01:16, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Bit of fair warning
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution.

The only reason I am not giving this to your opponent is because she was just blocked 24h for vandalism. Do not edit-war with her when she returns, even if she is introducing objectionable material; use WP:RPP. -Jeremy (v^_^v Cardmaker) 04:18, 2 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Okay, no problem. Thanks for letting me know. Δnnuit Cœptis  04:19, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Username
Is that a reference to "annuit coeptis novus ordo seclorum"? I never understood much of it myself, but it's fascinating stuff and there's plenty of material on here about it! Regards, HJMitchell  You rang?  02:08, 4 May 2009 (UTC)


 * another one! HJMitchell  You rang?  10:51, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Ace Holliday talk page
According to DRC, one is allowed to delete the comments on their talk page with the exception of declined unblock requests, sockpuppetry warnings and multiple IP headers. I have reverted your rollback as the user is within his rights to edit his talk page. Thank you. The Red ╬  04:37, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay, no problem. I didn't think he could replace everything with the words "fuck you bitches." But if he's within his rights, I won't argue it. Δnnuit Cœptis  04:40, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * In an effort to keep Wikipedia clean, I have compromised and placed a placeholder message up there. He is free to change it as he wishes, however we cannot simply revert his blanking as it is technically allowed. Keep mopping. The Red  ╬  04:41, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

User talk:Jddunivant
You may be interested in my reply to your message on this user's talk page. – ukexpat (talk) 21:44, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Ahh, okay. Yeah, I just quickly skimmed that article and I didn't really read it in detail. Δnnuit Cœptis  23:05, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

User_talk:Otheday
Requests for sources is not harrassment. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 02:27, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Changing username
Thanks for your message.


 * 1. Will my talk page, my userpage, and any subpages I have be moved to my new username along with the history, or will I have to recreate them?
 * All these pages will be moved to your new username.
 * 2. I read that my contributions might not show up for a few days. But after a few days, I will get them all back exactly the way the were before, right?
 * That's right; once the process has run its course, they will all show up as before, just under your new username.
 * 3. If I'm looking at the history of a page I have edited, will my name in the history tab be changed to my new name automatically or will it show my old username?
 * Your name will be changed in the history of articles - this is the process which takes the time. Privacy issues are one common reason why people change username, so it is important that this happens.


 * You can find further information on changing your username and the effects of this at Changing username. Warofdreams talk 09:48, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Sorry
If you were a fan of the football team Newcastle United, I'm sure you would understand, but message received. — Preceding unsigned comment added by A Tried And Tested Method (talk • contribs)

Re:Vandalism
Lol, no problem. That guy and a few similarly named socks have been rampaging about all evening. I think yours was actually the first page to get hit though. Lucky you! Anyway, I think he's done. D rew  S  mith  What I've done  06:46, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism
I see you edited out my post again. And what is that name you called me ? Tell me then, how can you claim that a court ruling that creating a precedent changing the legal deffinition of abuse itself, violates the WP:WEIGHT condition. Futher this case involed statements from Cognex's most senior mangement. These statements showed that abuse was not defined propery in law. The cognex vs lemelson however passes WP:WEIGHT. I have documented that the harrasment case is commonly cited today in legal proceding. Please try to make me understand how this could be.

Also the man who started this idiocy is named arnold reinhold and there was an arnold reinhold involved in the lemelson lawsuit. If its the same peron is this acceptable?

Just give me a coherant reason on the WP:WEIGHT requirement and I'll fuck off. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cogvoid (talk • contribs)

:-)
Hello!! Can you tell how can put your signature as Annuit Coeptis with colours...?!?

I like this userbox...

Maybe, i will put my profile... :-)))))))

Thanks!! --Lightwarrior2 (talk) 19:13, 23 June 2009 (UTC)


 * No... You are not alone here... but... be carefull what you do or say here, ok...?!? Its just an suggestion... You know, we dont have opinion here... by the way, give me your opinion about this... "9/11 Dollar bill images request" started by me (the conversation) But be neutral... Tell me only what you think...

Take this
a "gift" from me, to you... :-)





Sorry... Lightwarrior2 (talk) 19:15, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I will!! :-)  you have msn?!?  Sorry the delay... i´am a little busy in these days...


 * No problem!! Deleted. :-)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lightwarrior2 (talk • contribs) 19:50, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

April 2015
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=656385790 your edit] to The Turner Diaries may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:40, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
 * eliminated. Africa was invaded and all of its black inhabitants were killed. The Puerto Ricans described as a "repulsive mongrel race" were exterminated and the island of Puerto Rico was re-

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)