User talk:YOKOTA Kuniteru


 * It was helpful. YOKOTA Kuniteru (talk) 15:00, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sapporo Super Clear


The article Sapporo Super Clear has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This appears to be a label ingredients list. No notability. Why should it have its own encyclopaedia entry?

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 00:17, 2 October 2009 (UTC)


 * At least, the article was made, not as a spam. In this over 100 days, the article is improved. But the article is still a kid for the volume. It needs more time to become an adult. In any case, thank you for your kindness. YOKOTA Kuniteru (talk) 14:41, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Suntory Fine Zero


The article Suntory Fine Zero has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This appears to be a label ingredients list. No notability. Why should it have its own encyclopaedia entry?

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 00:18, 2 October 2009 (UTC)


 * At least, the article was made, not as a spam. In this over 100 days, the article is improved. But the article is still a kid for the volume. It needs more time to become an adult. In any case, thank you for your kindness. YOKOTA Kuniteru (talk) 14:41, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Beer welcome
 SilkTork  *YES! 08:07, 26 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Hello, SilkTork, thank you very much. These links are helpful. YOKOTA Kuniteru (talk) 17:47, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

List of organic beers
Hi YOKOTA Kuniteru, and thanks for creating List of organic beers. I understand that you were motivated to create the list as we do not have much material on organic beers on Wikipedia; however, a simple list of brand names is not very helpful as it is not putting the topic in context. We have guidelines such as WP:NOTDIR, WP:Beer lists and WP:SALAT which discourage such lists. I would suggest doing some research on organic beer, and creating an article such as Organic wine and Organic coffee. I would be willing to assist you in doing that. In the meantime I have redirected the list to Beer and breweries by region, which is the closest we have to a List of beers. If you do create Organic beer, then we can change List of organic beers to redirect to that article. Please get in touch if you have any further questions, or would like help in creating Organic beer. Regards  SilkTork  *YES! 08:07, 26 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi SilkTork. The operation between Beer and breweries by region and List of organic beers is all right. Before making the List of organic beers, YOKOTA Kuniteru have known Organic beer had been deleted once. YOKOTA Kuniteru thought the list might also be a deletable article for the same or similar reason. If YOKOTA Kuniteru have the next time to make the article on organic beer, YOKOTA Kuniteru will write it with the guidelines, with your suggestions, with YOKOTA Kuniteru's own English ability. Thank you very much. YOKOTA Kuniteru (talk) 17:47, 26 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Leave a note on my talkpage when you are ready to write the article. Regards.  SilkTork  *YES! 22:56, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

June 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Greek wine, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This is particularly important when adding or changing any facts or figures and helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Tomas e (talk) Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Greek wine. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tomas e (talk) 21:00, 30 June 2010 (UTC)


 * That edition was some mistake. The mistakeless edition is this edition. YOKOTA Kuniteru (talk) 21:14, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Suntory Fine Zero for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Suntory Fine Zero is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Suntory Fine Zero until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. // ⌘macwhiz (talk) 01:34, 12 April 2011 (UTC)


 * The story is all right. Thank you for your information. YOKOTA Kuniteru (talk) 15:26, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ichirō Hatoyama, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Goo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 3 May 2013 (UTC)


 * It was improved, with "&Mdash;" to " &amp;mdash; " and the end of the link. Thank you. YOKOTA Kuniteru (talk) 14:09, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Glenn MIller removed from List of Freemasons.
Hello. Thanks for your interest in List of Freemasons. I personally have spent a LOT of time on that list and added hundreds to it. Glenn Miller has been removed from the list per this conversation. Here's why: First of all, we try to NOT use websites of individual lodges as citations for inclusion on the list because they are notoriously unreliable. Secondly, when you added him I look at a number of "tried and true" sources. These included the Grand Loge of British Columbia's website and the book 10,000 Famous Freemasons by William Denslow  which is by far the most cited source on the list. Glenn Miller is listed in neither. Trust me, as a big band fan and trombone player, I'd love to include Miller, but we need a better source and several of us have looked, but not been able to find one. Eric Cable |  Talk  12:17, 24 October 2013 (UTC)


 * YOKOTA Kuniteru has read Talk:List of Freemasons and written about it there. Thank you. YOKOTA Kuniteru (talk) 14:33, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Category:Masonic composers
Category:Masonic composers, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. RexxS (talk) 20:51, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
 * And the same for, under discussion at the same place. BencherliteTalk 22:14, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited All the Young Dudes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Medley. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Category:Coudenhove-Kalergi has been nominated for renaming
Category:Coudenhove-Kalergi has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 17:47, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Agree switch to. (e.g., Category:Beethoven family) YOKOTA Kuniteru (talk) 02:26, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Coincarboncap.com
Hello.

Sorry, but I've removed the tables you added which cited coincarboncap.com. The site doesn't appear reliable for Wikipedia. The site is anonymous and solicits donation in bitcoin and bitcoin cash, and while neither of those would be a disqualified by themselves, I see no indication of editorial oversight, fact checking, or any reputation for fact-checking and accuracy that is required by WP:RS.

If you would like another opinion, perhaps WP:RSN would be helpful.

Thanks. Grayfell (talk) 21:38, 4 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your verification. At some point in 2021, "coincarboncap.com" changed their donation coins from BTC, BSV, BCH, and ETH to BTC and BSV. YOKOTA Kuniteru found another source from the company TRG Datacenters in The Times on electric power consumption of cryptocurrencies: "https://www.thetimes.co.uk/money-mentor/article/eco-friendly-cryptocurrencies/". BUT, TRG Datacenters only mentioned "Kilowatt hour (KWh) consumed per transaction" in this article: "https://www.trgdatacenters.com/most-environment-friendly-cryptocurrencies/". How many transactions of each coin per day? YOKOTA Kuniteru wonder how much per day after all. Some coin miner's power source may be turning something with whales. YOKOTA Kuniteru would need to do some more research. YOKOTA Kuniteru (talk) 01:34, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
 * DOGE was partly based on LTC. DOGE's one block mining time is 1 minute, and LTC's time is 2.5 minutes: "https://www.coindesk.com/learn/dogecoin-mining-2022-everything-you-need-to-know/". BUT, "https://www.trgdatacenters.com/most-environment-friendly-cryptocurrencies/" says, "Kilowatt hour (KWh) consumed per transaction" of DOGE's is 0.12, and LTC's is 18.522. Why the significant difference? After all, are the whales swimming and generating electricity for DOGE? YOKOTA Kuniteru (talk) 04:38, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, YOKOTA Kuniteru. Thank you for your work on Three Days in August (1992 film). North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:06, 26 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello, the film has few references on the web, so hoping they will do a remake of it, starring for example Putin and Biden. YOKOTA Kuniteru (talk) 14:30, 2 February 2024 (UTC)