User talk:Yojimbo1941

-edited Leo IV, the Khazar - added primary and secondary source references

Disambiguation link notification for July 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Madison Capitols, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tim Sweeney. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

fixed, thank you, um, bot. Yojimbo1941 (talk) 13:54, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stefan Dečanski, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ragusa and Ragusan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jim Cummins (ice hockey), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:49, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Hockey on the ice listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hockey on the ice. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. . Right now this links to bandy, which is quite ridiculous if you ask me. Hockey on ice is ice hockey, and the redirect should justifiably go to that page. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 00:23, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Adding references can be easy
Hello! Here's how to add references from reliable sources for the content you add to Wikipedia. This helps maintain the Wikipedia policy of verifiability.

Adding well formatted references is actually quite easy:
 * 1) While editing any article or a wikipage, on the top of the edit window you will see a toolbar which says "Cite". Click on it.
 * 2) Then click on "Templates".
 * 3) Choose the most appropriate template and fill in as many details as you can. This will add a well formatted reference that is helpful in case the web URL (or "website link") becomes inactive in the future.
 * 4) Click on Preview when you're done filling out the 'Cite (web/news/book/journal)' to make sure that the reference is correct.
 * 5) Click on Insert to insert the reference into your editing window content.
 * 6) Click on Show preview to Preview all your editing changes.
 * Before clicking on Save page, check that a References header  ==References==  is near the end of the article.
 * And check that    is directly underneath that header.
 * 7.Click on Save page. ...and you've just added a complete reference to a Wikipedia article.

You can read more about this on Help:Edit toolbar or see this video File:RefTools.ogv.

Hope this helps, --Shearonink (talk) 18:15, 22 August 2016 (UTC)


 * To use this message, place  on User:talk pages when needed.

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks much!Yojimbo1941 (talk) 14:31, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

shit
Jesus fucking christ I just figured out that Rick Gomez is an actual person and that Sam Rockwell did not star in Band of Brothers;

Mongolians in Normandy
I looked at your edit of the article Langing in Normandy: you introduced new ridiculous mistake: Mongolia was never a part of Soviet Union. (Look at the map where Mongolia is). I repeat that "Conscripts from Monglia" is nonsense, because Mongolia was never controled by Germany to perform conscription there. I can imagine that some Mongolian person volunteered to German army (which is highly unlikely, and in any case exceptional) but then one probably can find a person of any nation whatsoever in the German army.

"Mongolian decent" (as you wrote in my talk page) is even a greater nonsense than what you wrote in Wikipedia. First of all "people of Mongolian descent" is not the same as "Mongolians", or "volunteers from Mongolia" or "conscripts from Mongolia". Second, who cares of the "descent" of any person in this context? I bet that in any large unit of German army there were people of Jewish descent. But to write that they were "jewish colunteers" or "jewish conscripts" would be complete nonsense.

Pym1507


 * Hi, Pym. I think you should look up exactly what Ostlegionen consisted of and then read the citations I included, which include examples of Russian and Mongolian troops, many who were POWs captured during Germany's battles with the Soviet Union (which is also very interesting).  As for Mongolia ever having been a part of the Soviet Union, it was protected from Japan during World War II and did have a Bolshevik government installed.  But it may be better to just word the sentence differently since not all Ost troops were from Soviet-controlled areas anyway (Eastern Europe and East Asia, for example).

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you! WMF Surveys, 18:25, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey
Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks! WMF Surveys, 01:23, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

'''If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again.''' We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. WMF Surveys, 00:32, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of CryptoKitties for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CryptoKitties is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/CryptoKitties until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jtbobwaysf (talk) 21:30, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Peloponnesian War
Hello. You should change the edit request template from  to   after you have done it. If there is no such parameter, you may add it yourself. Regards ―Abelmoschus Esculentus 13:25, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Ah, thank you. I wasn't even thinking about that. Yojimbo1941 (talk) 16:41, 22 October 2018 (UTC)