Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Invincible class battlecruisers/archive1

Invincible class battlecruisers
I am nominating the Invincible class battlecruisers for GT because I believe that it meets the criteria. All four articles are at GA and they share a common layout and navbox. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sturmvogel 66 (talk • contribs)


 * Support - excellent work on such an innovative class of vessels for naval warfare. I am a participant in WP:OMT, of which this topic is a part of. -MBK004 02:14, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Support - meets the criteria, good work Sturm. Your articles are always good for a fun read! ^am also an OMT member — Ed   (talk  •  majestic titan)  07:27, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Support - Great. Two 'invincible' nominations at the same time. Great effort by Sturm. - DSachan (talk) 13:37, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Support - good to see a British class! I too find the two "invincible" nominations ironic - rst20xx (talk) 03:48, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Support Great job! Just a couple consistency concerns: Armour or Armor? For Invincible, put the three battles under "World War I" like the others. Notes or References? Reywas92 Talk  20:20, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
 * These vessels are British, so armour should be used. -MBK004 23:19, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Armour is used consistently, now.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:57, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Support it's good to see that GTs have caught onto the WPShips and WPMilHist projects, one of the most prolific ones around wikipedia. Nergaal (talk) 18:37, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Support Another triumph for OMT. TomStar81 (Talk) 22:12, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - can you create a book on this topic? Just click on the link in the top left of the topic box and create a book there, copying the formatting used in other existing books - rst20xx (talk) 20:34, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Done -MBK004 on the iPhone 16:36, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Close with consensus to promote - rst20xx (talk) 22:57, 16 December 2009 (UTC)