Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Looking 4 Myself/archive1

Looking 4 Myself

 * Contributor(s): User:Et3rnal, User:Status, User:Tomica, User:Dan56

The album and all songs article from the album are all good articles, therefore they all meet criteria for being a good topic. 和DITOR E tails 20:50, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Pinging, , , to see if they are interested in addressing the issue Adabow brought up. If not, this nomination may have to be closed with no promotion. GamerPro64 04:35, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
 * A note: The nominator didn't make any significant edits to the articles. All of them were built and GANed by, and me. —  Tomíca (T2ME) 22:14, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Another note: Yes. that's true. I have, however, added chart positions to the articles. Also, keep in mind that the good topic criteria does not make any mention of the nominator having to make major edits to the articless. 和DITOR  E tails 22:42, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
 * When creating this page, you clearly removed the "nominators" section which says you should list "yourself and other important contributors to the topic". You did not contribute to the articles at hand, as Tomica pointed out. There's nothing preventing you from nominating it yourself, but you excluded the editors who actually worked on them. Also: "Nominators must be sufficiently familiar with the subject matter and sources to deal with objections during the FTC/GTC process. If you nominate something you have worked on, note it as a self-nomination. Nominators who are not significant contributors to the articles of the topic should consult regular editors of the articles prior to nomination." I have added our names and the missing count of articles to properly complete this nomination. — Status  ( talk  ·  contribs ) 23:06, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delegate Comment - Barring the fact that the nomination was improperly prepared, this review needs to have some discussion. GamerPro64  16:55, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I was looking at Looking 4 Myself to see whether there is (or should be) a tour article, but that section is severely outdated and inconclusive and I don't feel happy supporting this GTC at the moment per 1d. Otherwise, the topic meets the criteria. Adabow (talk) 01:25, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The tour never happened... There's nothing to add. I readded the information about it being postponed, I don't know why that was removed. The dates were never rescheduled. — Status  ( talk  ·  contribs ) 07:24, 11 May 2014 (UTC)


 * I could support if the "nominator issue" isn't enough to bar this topic from promotion... igordebraga ≠ 23:49, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Support Looks good now. Adabow (talk) 06:49, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Closed with a consensus to promote to Good Topic. - GamerPro64  19:35, 5 June 2014 (UTC)