Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Nuclear weapons/archive1

Nuclear weapons
The nuclear weapons series is simply the best one I know of on Wikipedia. Category:Nuclear weapons has nearly a hundred articles and several subcategories, but there is also a clear and superb core, represented by the template User:Fastfission designed. The most important articles beyond the template are generally linked as main subarticles from sections, and many of them are quite substantial as well.

Nominate and support--ragesoss 19:56, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

Circeus 20:06, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose
 * At least three articles have no references whatsoever. Inline citations would be even better.
 * Several display serious layout issues, notably Nuclear warfare.
 * One is proteced, and one has a merger issue pending.
 * Also obviously not peer reviewed (when doing so, make sure to mention your aim is not FA, though)

Conditional support. Get a least three references for each article. Once that's done you can change my vote to support.--HereToHelp 18:15, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Oppose per Circeus. Some of the articles completely lack reference. Other objections raised are also serious. -Ambuj Saxena (talk) 08:49, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Nomination was not promoted on 06:40, 29 April 2006 - rst20xx (talk) 13:24, 12 August 2009 (UTC)