Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Bulbasaur/archive2


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was not promoted by SandyGeorgia 16:56, 21 April 2009.

Bulbasaur

 * Nominator(s): Þέŗṃέłḥìμŝ LifeDeath 14:51, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

I have nominated Bulbasaur for FA becasue it was a FA article previously, then WP:FANSITE came and knocked it out. Since then have worked hard and we believe it is ready again.Þέŗṃέłḥìμŝ LifeDeath 14:45, 21 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Oppose – There are some unsourced statements and the reception section still needs to be expanded. Also, you're not a significant contributor to the article so this nomination should be removed. — The Le ft orium  15:07, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I am.Not recently ,because I have been working on other pokemon, but I still worked on it a lot.-Þέŗṃέłḥìμŝ LifeDeath 15:11, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Have you used another account or something? Because the history page says you've only made two edits.  The Le ft orium  15:14, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I helped from the project pages talk page, which since have been deleted, there left.-Þέŗṃέłḥìμŝ LifeDeath 15:17, 21 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Oppose - The article isn't ready yet. Cultural Impact still needs some expansion, one or two of the refs are dead links, etc. MelicansMatkin (talk) 15:15, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose and suggest withdrawal; quite a long way from featuredness at the moment. Sceptre (talk) 16:39, 21 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: Please see WP:FAC/ar and leave the talk page templates in place until the bot processes.  Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 16:54, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.