Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Chicago Bears/archive4

Chicago Bears
This is the article about the American Pro Football Team. It is a well-written article covering all the basics about the franchise and its illustrious history in the National Football League. In my opinion, I believe that it is a more indepth article than the New England Patriots article, which has gained featured status. I have worked hard on this article and so have other Wikipedia members. This is the fourth nomination attempt, and I believe that the article meets all reasonable feature status requirements. The article's images all have been tagged properly as I have personally checked every image. --Happyman22 18:50, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Previous Nominations Featured article candidates/Chicago Bears/archive1 Featured article candidates/Chicago Bears/archive2 Featured article candidates/Chicago Bears/archive3


 * [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|15px]] Support as per nomination --Happyman22 18:50, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: A took a quick glance and noticed some easy things to fix. Some images are too big, and the infobox is really wide.  Change your screen resolution to 800x600 and see what you think.  At low resolutions, "The 1946 NFL Championship team photo" and the infobox are really close to each other, and the picture underneath "1976-2000" takes up a significant portion of the screen.  Drop that one to 250px or so.  Regarding references: you know you can use the same reference more than once without retyping it?  Do the following:, and then the next time you need that source, just type  .  Simple as that.  It'll reduce the amount of text in your edit window, and will shorten the footnotes section.  For example, all of the "The Honey Bears and Chicago Bears Mascots" refs will show up once.  Once that's done, add more citations to the "Statistics and records" section; there's only one there and there are more numbers and details to cite. --Spangineeres  (háblame)  19:42, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * [[Image:symbol support vote.svg|15px]] Support Very nice, and looks technically ready. If I may nitpick, though, could you move the current logo above the Logo word, then make it more prominent than the previous logo? --Kitch 21:38, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Corrections: As per request, the "1946 team photo" was moved down so it wouldn't interfer with the infobox.  The Payton picture was dropped to 250px, the references were redone as per the helpful tip given by Spangineer, more citations were added to the "stats" section, and the current logo was moved above the older logo and the older logo was decreased in size per the request of Kitch.  Thank you both for your help and support. --Happyman22 23:30, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I'm sorry for trying to spoil (could be easily corrected) your 4th and could successful attempt on getting this article being featured. I was browsing through your photos. It is probably going to be hard to have a "free" alternative (public domain, GFDL, Creative Commons, etc.,) versions of football action, but you need to cite the authors correctly. The Walter Payton picture isn't made by the Sporting News. In fact, they credited on their website as an Associated Press photo. Anyways, good luck. --4.253.39.183 01:05, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Another comment I also wanted to add that although I don't think it is required for to be a featured article. The images probably should have "Rationale of fair use for..." on the copyright images. For example, Image:Vforvendettamov.jpg. --4.253.39.183 01:09, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|15px]] Support, provided the fair use rationale issue is resolved. Much improved since the previous nominations. One picky comment - the Statistics and records section could do with a quick copyedit (I would do it myself, but I'm unfamiliar with American football terminology). Oldelpaso 18:34, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I have added rationale to the Walter Payton picture and fixed the source as the AP and not Sporting News.
 * [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|15px]] Bear Down, Support! - I know how long everyone involved has work on this one, and it SHOWS! Excellent work! (And by the way, I have a copy of the Chicago Symphony Chorus performing the fight song. If I rip it to .ogg, can you use an excerpt? If interested, let me know on my talk page!) --JohnDBuell 03:02, 14 August 2006 (UTC) User_talk:JohnDBuell
 * [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|15px]] Oppose, fair use images need source information and fair use rationales.--Peta 01:47, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I hate to say it but she's right. More fair use rationales are needed, particularly on the logo images. --JohnDBuell 04:31, 18 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Corrections The images have more fair use rationales added to them especially the logo images. I believe that enough rationale to each image. --Happyman22 14:21, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: I would have perhaps phrased the rationales a bit more like those in Image:Superbowlshuffle.jpg, but it is an improvement. --JohnDBuell 02:02, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|15px]] Continued Support: I Supported thsi article the last time around and all of my concerns were adressed last time around. Wikipedia's   False Prophet   holla at me   Improve Me 23:28, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|15px]] Support da bears, though the fair use images should get a bit of attention as noted above, I don't think they'll pose much of a problem. However, Stephen Colbert might tell you otherwise. ♠ SG →Talk 17:40, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|15px]] Support, a solid article.--Riurik 05:13, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Support while I would get rid of the duplicate logo in the logos section, the objection from me, which led to pile-on the last FAC has been resolved. Jaranda wat's sup 23:20, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: Captions to photos and illustrations need to be regularized. Should all be lower-cased without random capitalization. Moncrief 16:38, 29 August 2006 (UTC)