Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Darfur conflict/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was not promoted 00:37, 3 December 2007.

Darfur conflict
I'm nominating this article as I feel it brings a large amount of information on a topic that can be hard to comprehend. It does a nice job of giving the information without being biased which is hard on this topic. Gtstricky (talk) 19:23, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Oppose: Article has numerous problems. First is stability. Others are presence of too many red links, MOS issues, not proper formatting of references etc. I can see some 'Citation needed tags' also hanging in the middle.             DSachan (talk) 23:59, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose [1a] Just having read the TOC, the History section needs more heading organization and more appropriately named subheadings than November XX - "beginning" "middle" "end" is the general premise - have there been no turning points in any way? the beginning of the media attention? any major political diplomatic action, etcetera--Keer lls ton 17:01, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose - per all above. Especially the problem of stability, with too many moves for a FA. &mdash; Rudget contributions 11:15, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.