Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Monty Python/archive1

Monty Python
A very brilliantly written article with peer review. Worth a look, in my opinion. --Tykell 04:57, 10 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Object - On a 5 second scan of the article, I already found two big flaws. #1) The WP:LEAD is improperly sized, and is not a summary of the article.  #2) The "Trivia" section should be converted to prose.  Lists such as these have no place in a featured article. There may be more issues, but these were instantly noticable upon simply scrolling down the page without reading. Fieari 05:04, 10 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Move to Peer review: Move this article to Peer review. There are zero in-line citations in the article. Many images are used under fair use, but there's no documented reasoning behind how the use of those images qualifies as fair use. These are just two of the many glaring issues that need to be addressed. AreJay 14:51, 10 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Object Further to Fieari, whether or not the information in that section is in list or prose form, much of it is too trivial (quiz rounds in Jeopardy, for example) to even be in a 'trivia' section. --BillC 23:09, 10 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Object lead is too long (3 pgraphs max). fairuse images need fairuse rationale. incoporate trivia into main body of text. there is no "Legacy" section explaining their long-term influence (south park for example). maybe turn the "pythonesque" section into this? Zzzzz 09:38, 12 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Object lead too long and too much individual biographical info --Bob 18:37, 12 April 2006 (UTC)