Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic/archive4


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was archived by Ian Rose via FACBot (talk) 21:29, 9 December 2014 (UTC).

My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic

 * Nominator(s): Sherlock Boy

I am nominating this article because it meets the Wikipedia criteria of a good article, and it is a subject that has created a push for social and gender equality and non-discrimination about what people can or cannot like. This article is about a show that has attracted an unusual and semi-controversial audience and promotes positive messages about life and friendship. The show also carries with it a demographic of fans who defy the social constructs of what older men "should" like. The show has become an internet phenomenon, spawning memes and creative fan works. Officially-licensed comic books, movies, books, video games, a collectable card game, charitable organizations, and even vinyl records related to the show have been produced as a result of the show's overwhelming success.


 * Comment: I'm sure these are all good points, but if I'm not mistaken, featured articles are promoted by quality of content, not social impact. Refer to the featured article criteria.  Anon 126   (notify me of responses! / talk / contribs) 16:36, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Note -- This was only transcluded to the FAC list today. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 14:02, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Oppose and recommend procedural close. The nominator has never even edited this article (and has made only four edits in the last two years) and has not consulted with the main editors about its readiness. From a casual glance it doesn't appear to be leagues away from a possible FA candidacy, but there are still basic problems with source quality that were present last year. I would also prefer an informed preparation process in consultation with the article's main editors. -- Laser brain  (talk)  16:41, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Tks Andy, I'll archive this shortly. BTW I notice quite a bit of material is uncited, and that will also need to be rectified before any future nomination. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 21:28, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Ian Rose (talk) 21:29, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.