Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/The Adventures of Tintin

The Adventures of Tintin
Partial self-nomination. A remarkable in-depth article on one of Europe's most influential comic series. It was previously listed but then did not get enough support, I hope that now it can. I believe all objections raised then are now adressed. {&Alpha;&nu;&#940;&rho;&iota;&omicron;&nu;} 09:54, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)


 * Support. Not bad! - Ta bu shi da yu 13:06, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Support, I've used the article as a project reference before, and it was essentially the most concise and complete thing I found on the net. --  user:zanimum
 * Support, good article. Grinner 15:39, Oct 13, 2004 (UTC)
 * Support. zoney &#09827; talk 15:54, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * I have my doubts about the fair use of the image of Tintin. Without the explicit autorisation of the heirs of Hergé or the publishing house Casterman, fair use looks problematic. I'm under the impression that they are rather strict in protecting this copright and have done so in the past. This should be cleared up (see talk page of the Adventures of Tintin and talk page of the image). Otherwise, an excellent article worth featuring. JoJan 17:48, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * I think we need to go through the fair use article and see if we can justify the use of this license for this article. Personally, I think it would be OK, I just think the image itself needs have a better page description of the license. - Ta bu shi da yu 11:39, 14 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * I think it qualifies as fair use: its use as such in the French Wikipedia is unquestioned. {&Alpha;&nu;&#940;&rho;&iota;&omicron;&nu;} 14:58, 14 Oct 2004 (UTC)


 * I'm not so sure about fair use. The image falls under the Belgian law, since it was created in Belgium. The copyright laws of the USA are not the same as on the European continent. I give an example (in French) : [] where the intellectual property of the author is explained, especially (again in French) : "En vertu de la loi sur la propriété intellectuelle, diffuser les oeuvres de tiers constitue un acte d'exploitation qui n'est possible qu'avec l'autorisation de l'auteur. (Dissiminating the works of a third person constitutes an act which is only possible with the autorisation of the author) Une diffusion sans autorisation de l'auteur empêche, en effet, ce dernier de vivre de son travail et méconnaît les investissements des éditeurs et / ou des producteurs. Lors de la diffusion d'une de ses oeuvres, sans autorisation préalable de sa part, l'auteur est susceptible de demander des dommages (the author can ask for damages) et intérêts au titre du préjudice moral et patrimonial subi.". This has caused, among others, the Dutch Wikipedia to ban the use of "fair use". On the other hand, the servers of Wikipedia are situated inside the USA, but then the image originates from the French Wikipedia, which again refers to the English Wikipedia for the use of "fair use". It's a bit complicated, but, without explicit autorisation of the heirs of the author, I'm inclined against "fair use". JoJan 19:09, 14 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * "I'm not so sure about fair use. The image falls under the Belgian law, since it was created in Belgium. " - wrong. Copyright itself is limited by what it is in the originating country (thus, the USA will not protect the copyright on a work longer than the country of origin does). However, that is the *ONLY* area in which origin matters. Everything else is determined by what country the exception is taking place in - for Wikipedia, that's the US because our databse servers are located there (we have squids outside the US). I suggset you read the Copyright FAQ that James and I wrote. &rarr;Raul654 05:15, Oct 15, 2004 (UTC)
 * Object. Fair use claim is tenuous at best, and not likely to be compatible with the GFDL anyway. - Taxman 15:44, Oct 15, 2004 (UTC)
 * Comment to the above: I have replaced the image with one that is copy-right free: Image:Tt-casterman-01.jpg {&Alpha;&nu;&#940;&rho;&iota;&omicron;&nu;} 15:59, 15 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * It claims to be, but on what grounds is that claim made? I can claim anything is copyright free and put it on a webserver.  Saying alone does not make it so. - Taxman 14:14, Oct 16, 2004 (UTC)
 * According to the site mentioned, the pin has copyright Casterman (= the publisher), which is even worse than the "fair use" JoJan 14:37, 16 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * The pin has copyright by Casterman, a photo of it has copyright by the photographer, who released it for free. {&Alpha;&nu;&#940;&rho;&iota;&omicron;&nu;} 10:02, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Reverted to other image: fair use is okay for the Wikipedia (see many other articles). {&Alpha;&nu;&#940;&rho;&iota;&omicron;&nu;} 10:06, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Support. Zerbey 13:56, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)