Wikipedia:Featured article removal candidates/Madonna

Madonna (entertainer)

 * Article is no longer a featured article.

I think Madonna deserves better than this. The article might once have been Brilliant Prose, but seems to have degenerated. Much of the body text is still rather good, but I think there are problems with structure and layout. Specific problems are:

I propose removing the article from FA status, with the hope that a new drive will lead to much-needed improvement to it. --Plek 20:43, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Lead section is too brief, and does not summarise the article properly.
 * ToC is overwhelming
 * Article is 52 kB long
 * The Discography is just screaming for a separate article (this would also solve the previous two issues)
 * The "Career achievements" section is very tedious and repetitive
 * No references and only one in-line citation
 * The sectioning of the article seems haphazard: the "Madonna Re-Invented" section seems to be tacked onto "Biography", with no apparent logic why a new level-2 section is used. The same applies to the "Current News" section, the title of which is also unencyclopedic. Also, the various aspects of Madonna's life (recording, media, cultural influence, film career, etc.) are all mixed together in the "Biography" section. I think a major refactoring of the existing data into a new section structure is in order.
 * Remove Everyking 23:20, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Remove Agree with all points. Also I think we should be moving away from "Trivia" sections.  If the factoids can't be worked into the main article then perhaps they're really not worth mentioning.  Interestingly some albums don't have their own articles.  If they did, then a lot of the info in the main article could be trimmed.   The article has a really good skeleton, but too much has been piled onto it, and unevenly at that. Rossrs 14:07, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Remove. Agree with the above. A lot of good material here, but also a fair amount of POV. - Taxman 13:30, Mar 7, 2005 (UTC)