Wikipedia:Featured article review/Pneumonia/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was removed by YellowAssessmentMonkey 01:28, 17 August 2009.

Review commentary
-- Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 02:15, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Large sections of this article remain unreferenced.
 * 2) Management section needs more details ( different treatments for different subgroups )
 * 3) No section on the social implications such as economics
 * 4) Public health measures


 * Images need alt text as per WP:ALT. Eubulides (talk) 20:35, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Referencing is inadequate (in my opinion, not even adequate for GA standard). The x-ray in the "Investigations" section looks more like a pleural effusion rather than pneumonia. Axl  ¤  [Talk]  22:38, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

FARC commentary

 * Suggested FA criteria concern are citations, comprehensiveness, alt text. Also note the recent change to WP:WIAFA (1c) requiring "high-quality" sources. FAQ?  YellowMonkey  ( cricket photo poll! '') paid editing=POV 00:45, 30 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Delist per Doc James. Grossly inadequate citations. JKBrooks85 (talk) 08:15, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delist, per FA criteria concerns. Cirt (talk) 03:11, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delist. The lack of citations is the biggest concern. It'd take a lot of work to fix that. Eubulides (talk) 04:34, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delist Agree -- Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:38, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delist per above concerns. No one is working on the article. It is not being actively edited. &mdash; mattisse  (Talk) 17:17, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.