Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/2004 NFL Draft

2004 NFL Draft
I believe that this list qualifies as a featured list. Much like the 2005 and 2006 versions of this list, this list is accurate, informative, and the few red links present are low-rounders who have apparently never made the team that they were drafted by. The only minor improvements that could be made are possibly an extra sentence or two in the introduction. On that note, I do nominate and support this list.--Wizardman 19:17, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - I would like to see a little more information in the lead and, like in the other lists, the numbers in the firs column centered. Apart from that, and after a quick look, the list seems good. Afonso Silva 12:36, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Done with the centering. I'll see what I can do with the lead. --Wizardman 15:36, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
 * How is it going with the lead? Afonso Silva 09:13, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * If I can find a citation for the first-round trade record, then I'm pretty much set. --Wizardman 15:09, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * The lead shouldn't contain red links. Apart from that, the list is good and I'll support if the red link turns blue. Cheers. Afonso Silva 23:35, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
 * True. Article made for redlinked guy, so I guess it's pretty good now. Hopefully there will be a couple more people who can support it though. --Wizardman 03:49, 29 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment - It would be nice to have the compensatory picks color-coded like how it is in the 2006 Draft. Ideally, 2005 draft should be changed to that as well to preserve uniformity...I guess I missed that the first time around when I was attempting to make 2005 and 2006 as similar styles as possible. Once that is done, Support. VegaDark 09:52, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Your color coded request is done (both 2004 and 2005 drafts). --Wizardman 13:30, 28 June 2006 (UTC)


 * I asked a couple people to look at this, as this is only one support away without any objections so far. Hopefully this will stay up for 2-3 more days. --Wizardman 02:47, 30 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Yeah it can stay up for a couple days. Until Monday afternoon (UTC) to be precise, because I won't have much net access during the weekend. -- Run e Welsh | &tau;&alpha;&lambda;&kappa; 12:21, 30 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment: list is a bit red-linked. Also, your real references (i.e. where you got the list from) is cited in the external link section. Please do correct this. For right format to cite webpages please see cite web. Renata 12:29, 30 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Support, though I'd love to see mention of the Giants/Chargers trade that overwhelmed the coverage of the draft. One sentence mention would suffice somewhere in the lead. Pepsidrinka 18:52, 2 July 2006 (UTC)


 * I have a reference toward the Giants-Chargers trade, although a mentiono fit in the lead would probably be a good idea. I fixed the references up a little bit but I know it still needs work. --Wizardman 21:51, 2 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Support -- Run e Welsh | &tau;&alpha;&lambda;&kappa; 14:44, 3 July 2006 (UTC)