Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Daytime Emmy Award for Outstanding Supporting Actress in a Drama Series/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by User:Hahc21 00:31, 23 July 2013 (UTC).

Daytime Emmy Award for Outstanding Supporting Actress in a Drama Series

 * Nominator(s): — Ar  re   and SoapFan12 15:52, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

We are nominating this for featured list because we believe that it meets the every single criteria. Also, we believe it to be well sourced and clear. After much tweaking and further adjustments we feel that it is worthy of being a Featured List. If you oppose, please address your issues here so they can be resolved. We believe this list is worthy, considering we worked on it with the Featured lists, Daytime Emmy Award for Outstanding Younger Actress in a Drama Series and Daytime Emmy Award for Outstanding Younger Actor in a Drama Series, in mind. It is very similar to the standard of those, therefore, we hope it is worthy of reaching that status. SoapFan12 15:52, 1 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Support on prose and images. Good job! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:59, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you, this means a lot! SoapFan12 02:36, 8 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Support – Underneath-it-All (talk) 16:44, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you, this means a lot! SoapFan12 02:36, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Comments – prose has somewhat been dealt with, so I'll have a quick look at refs...
 * Tables ideally should meet MOS:DTT and include rowscopes and colscopes


 * Given you have provided weblinks to newspaper sources, are page numbers suffice? I would probably remove them, but it's up to you.
 * Comment: As most of the newspapers are at Google News Archive (and thus possibly on their way offline) I'd suggest keeping the page numbers. If GNews archive goes offline, we can still have the paper newspapers as a reliable source. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:42, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I've got to agree with Crisco 1492. SoapFan12 17:22, 4 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Publication sources need locations if they are not given in the title. (ie: USA Today, Variety, The Gazette, The Register-Guard, Deseret News, The Union Democrat)
 * Can you please be more clear? What do I need to add? SoapFan12 17:22, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The city where the work was published. So Variety would be location=Los Angeles, The Gazette would be Sonora, California, etc. This suggestion is per WP:CITEHOW. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:13, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅. SoapFan12 19:37, 7 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Not necessary to have retrieve dates for external links – Lemonade51 (talk) 15:14, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅ SoapFan12 17:22, 4 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment – It seems that the main table has the required rowscopes and colscopes. However, the smaller tables still appear to be lacking them. That's the one issue that stood out to me when I looked at the list. Giants2008  ( Talk ) 22:14, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅ SoapFan12 09:54, 5 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Support - Superb job on organization and prose!
 * -Birdienest81 (talk) 23:48, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you, this means a lot! SoapFan12 02:36, 8 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Support All major issues have been addressed and I see nothing further. Great job!Caringtype1 (talk) 02:17, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you, this means a lot! SoapFan12 02:36, 8 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Support, meticulously sourced and well formatted. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 22:41, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.