Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Ipswich Town F.C. statistics and records


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted 20:17, 12 February 2008.

List of Ipswich Town F.C. statistics and records
I'm nominating this list for WP:FL as I firmly believe it meets the criteria required, (most specifically 1-(a)-3. : contains a finite, complete and well-defined set of items that naturally fit together to form a significant topic of study, and where the members of the set are not sufficiently notable to have individual articles). It's been thoroughly copy-edited, factually verified, peer reviewed and I humbly submit it to the scrutiny of the community as part of an on-going drive to bring Ipswich Town F.C. to featured topic status. Thank you in advance for your time and comments. The Rambling Man (talk) 10:12, 2 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Support This article went through a very thorough PR and I think all issues have now been ironed out. To me this is a very-well referenced and annotated series of lists that fit together underneath the umbrella of the article's title and meets the criteria TRM suggests. Peanut4 (talk) 17:56, 2 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Support -- Crzycheetah 02:12, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Support assuming you'll correct the typo in "Allan Hunter has a toatal of 53" in one of the footnotes..... ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:28, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Ahem, correction made, good spot! The Rambling Man (talk) 10:32, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Support sorry I've not been more, er, supportive, at the list itself. Great work as ever. --Dweller (talk) 10:57, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Support Looks good to me. пﮟოьεԻ   5  7  11:31, 4 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment Existing content looks fine, but I've thought of a couple more that could be added, namely streaks (ie. most consecutive wins / losses / matches unbeaten / matches without a win) and most/least points in a season. May need definitions and caveats, but I think they are interesting to know. What do you reckon? --Jameboy (talk) 19:50, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Response Added those you've recommended but I must be careful that this doesn't descend into trivia! Hope that's enough for you!  The Rambling Man (talk) 20:22, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Support Very comprehensive, excellent. But I guess my mission to find out the number of blades of grass on the Portman Road pitch will have to wait... :-( --Jameboy (talk) 20:41, 4 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Support. This list had an active peer review as a result of which the nominator improved its quality significantly. It manages to deal with an inherently almanac-y topic without descending into fancruft, and is well annotated and referenced. Three minor points (without which the nominator would be concerned I hadn't considered the matter properly):
 * The European attendances section uses "v" where other sections use "against".
 * I'm not sure the successive references to Ipswich's qualification for various European competitions (notes 53-60 approx) need to wikilink Football League First Division every time.
 * Please could you add the ISBN for your book source.
 * Good work! Struway2 (talk) 09:23, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I've adjusted the article per your comments above, I hope you're now completely satisfied!  Thanks for your eagle eyes, as ever.. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:32, 5 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Support I think this follows a good template and I am glad this has been accepted as a list format. I think it meets all the FLC criteria and stays on the right side of the Almanacy line. Well done. Woody (talk) 12:19, 6 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Support Fantastic list, definitely worthy of Featured List status, more great work by The Rambling Man! NapHit (talk) 21:04, 7 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Support Very impressive piece of work. Never thought I'd see a records article reach it this far. Well done. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:46, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.