Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Roman Catholic archbishops of New York/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 17 August 2020 (UTC).

List of Roman Catholic archbishops of New York

 * Nominator(s): Bloom6132 (talk) 00:16, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because I feel its structure and formatting mirrors the other lists I have successfully nominated to FL (e.g. bishops of Hong Kong, archbishops of Vancouver, Toronto, and Quebec), and it now meets all 6 FL criteria. —Bloom6132 (talk) 00:16, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * Just a couple of things from me:
 * "Newly-formed" in the lead needs a hyphen
 * Notes which are not complete sentences (just the one for Hughes's first listing, I think) don't need a full stop.
 * Note B is missing an s after an apostrophe
 * Think that's it from me -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:31, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
 * thanks very much for the swift feedback! I hope I've addressed it satisfactorily. —Bloom6132 (talk) 07:39, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

Another well made list. Nice work. ~ HAL  333  02:28, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:16, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Support: Fixed a typo found in the article; besides that, looks good to me. -- 0qd (talk) 03:55, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment
 * The only question I have is why bishop is capitalized in the John Hughes image caption and archbishop isn't.
 * ah, that's because of MOS:JOBTITLES. Didn't find out about that myself until March this year (in this discussion).  The first mention (capitalized) is the proper job title, while the latter one isn't. —Bloom6132 (talk) 02:40, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Hmm. You learn something new everyday. ~ HAL  333  02:44, 8 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Support Solid list. ~ HAL  333  02:44, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Source review - Pass
Doing now. Aza24 (talk) 22:48, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
 * I would be hesitant about including locations for refs 6 and 7 since you don't include them anywhere else. You don't put it in ref 26 for the same source anyways.
 * Everything else looks good, consistent templates, formatting and reliability. Should be a quick pass if the locations are removed. Aza24 (talk) 22:58, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
 * removed both. I think you meant refs 7 and 8, because ref 6 (The Encyclopedia of New York City) is a book ref w/o a location parameter. —Bloom6132 (talk) 00:45, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Ah yes, good catch. Keep up the good work with these lists, they are consistently concise, helpful and nicely formatted. Pass for the source review. Aza24 (talk) 01:13, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

Giants2008 ( Talk ) 22:39, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.