Comments
- File:RBK-Valencia 2-0.JPG does not use alt text.
- I think "and Norwegian Football Cup 9 times" would read better with as "and the Norwegian Football Cup 9 times".
- "in the club's inaugural season" - that gives me the impression that the club's first season is being referred to, rather than the league's first season. Perhaps use an alternative like "in its inaugural season" or "in the club's inaugural top tier season".
- "starting with the 1965–66 European Cup Winners' Cup." is uncited.
- "with the second-best performance the quarter-finals of the" - feels like there' something missing. Perhaps "with the second-best performance being the quarter-finals of the"?
- "Sigurd Rushfeldt is the league's all-time top scorer" - I think this is ambiguous; do you mean he's the club's highest league scorer or he's the Norweigan league highest scorer?
- Stated that only some of these were for Rosenborg, which in connection with the content of the previous sentence should make it clear. Arsenikk (talk) 14:51, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- "they received 75 million Norwegian krone when he was sold to Valencia in 2000" - could the euro equivalent be added in parentheses? According to the Carew article it's €8.5 million, although that figure is uncited.
- I have though about the issue a few times, but I have not been able to find good sources for the foreign exchange rates, although I agree that € and £ conversions would be optimal. Let me take a second look at this. Arsenikk (talk) 14:51, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- A number of the Norwegian Premier League titles came under the league's former name, so would it be better to retitle "Norwegian Premier League:" as "Norwegian First Division / Norwegian Premier League:"?
- Does "The double" really constitute an honour in itself? It's an achievement of course, but the victories comprising those doubles are already noted.
- Not per ce, but it is usually regarded as a historical achievement. By listing them it is easy to see which years it took place, instead of the reader having to hunt through two independent lists.
- Why are the leagues from the League of Norway District VIII to the Second Division regarded as "Minor" as opposed to "Major"? If they're all competed for in the same national league structure shouldn't they all be classified as "Major"?
- The League of Norway, despite being the top league, had eight conferences, with the conference winners playing a play-off. It is listed as minor because Rosenborg won its conference but not the championship title. Arsenikk (talk) 14:51, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- With them being friendly tournaments, are the La Manga Cup and the Trofeo Santiago Bernabéu really noteworthy? I mean, I would hope the Premier League Asia Trophy wouldn't be included in the corresponding Chelsea list, for example.
- I would evaluate them as minor titles in the club's history. To be quite fair, a comparison of Chelsea and Rosenborg regarding honors it not really a fair match. Both of these are major, international tournaments which do draw a fair media attention. Arsenikk (talk) 14:51, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Chelsea might not be the best example with their large trophy haul, but any club that has competed in pre-season tournaments such as these would be suitable enough as examples. Do you think it would be worth adding a footnote beside these two competitions noting that they're pre-season tournaments? Obviously the reader will be aware of that if they access their articles through the given wikilinks, but I think that might be worth making clear on this list. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:02, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I have made a comment about the inclusion of pre-season tournaments. Arsenikk (talk) 21:40, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- "Appearances" - why no cup apps?
- Because no complete compilation of cup apps per player is available, online or offline. The official web site operates with figures, but these are noted as being incomplete for several decades of seasons. Arsenikk (talk) 14:51, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- That's a shame, considering lower-league English clubs have such info readily available with Complete Record-type volumes. It might be worth noting somewhere above or in the table (and for the "Goalscorers" table") that cup apps aren't included and so the "Total" column isn't completely total? Mattythewhite (talk) 15:02, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- It seems there is not the same tradition for this type of statistics in Norway, although perhaps such stats will be available in the future. I have added a note to emphasize the exclusion of cup stats. Arsenikk (talk) 21:40, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- "Seasons" - it's pretty obvious the list accounts for longest-serving players by number of seasons, but I think that should be explained above the table, like you've done for the previous table.
- Hm, the previous reviewer told me to remove that line of information.
- "Goalscorers" - no cup goals.
- "Transfer fee records" - do you not have access to details for the record fees for players signed?
- I have not found any reliable list of transfer fees for incoming players and I fear anything I would create would be OR. Arsenikk (talk) 14:51, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- "First official match: 1928" - what does official mean in this context? Do you mean league?
- Refers to when Rosenborg was allowed to join the Football Association of Norway, which I have tried to specify. Arsenikk (talk) 14:51, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- "Record wins" - don't think we need the "Overall" win since the readers can work that out for themselves.
- Likewise for "Record defeats". Also, it would be good to know what the record cup defeat was.
- I would also like to know, but I have not found a source which could inform us. Arsenikk (talk) 14:51, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- "Streaks" - no "Longest drawing streak"? Or "Longest losing streak"?
- If some reliable source had published them, I would too. Arsenikk (talk) 14:51, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- "from the 1967 season." - do you mean "from the 1967 season onwards"?
Cheers, Mattythewhite (talk) 16:58, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Nice review...! The Rambling Man (talk) 18:05, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, nice review. Everything should have been answered and fixed where applicable. I'll try to find some foreign prices for the players. Arsenikk (talk) 14:51, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
|