Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of UEFA Cup winning managers


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted 21:00, 15 March 2008.

List of UEFA Cup winning managers
I'm nominating this to become a featured list - it's well illustrated, well referenced and meets the criteria. Thanks in advance for your comments, criticism and energy. The Rambling Man (talk) 11:09, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Support Excellent work, can't find any issues ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:01, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Support Of course. --Dweller (talk) 12:03, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Support Great work,only issue is that maybe the refs section should not be sortable, and I'm not sure if the captions require full stops, but these are minor issues. Great Work NapHit (talk) 12:15, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Good spot, fixed now. And captions only need full stops if they're not sentence fragments so, in this case, I think they're all okay.  Cheers! The Rambling Man (talk) 13:01, 5 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Comments just some minor, easily changable style issues:
 * "Wolves" → "Wolverhampton Wonderers"; just a little unclear right now where Wolves is if you're outside the UK
 * "25" → "twenty-five" per MOS
 * "Internazionale" → "Inter Milan" or "Milan's Internazionale"; "SS Lazio" → "S.S. Lazio" / "Rome's S.S. Lazio" (as Wolves comment) -- Matthew | talk | Contribs 20:29, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Fixed, thanks for pointing them out Matthew! The Rambling Man (talk) 08:03, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
 * You're welcome! Support -- Matthew | talk | Contribs 16:41, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Hate to differ but my reading of the MOS is that it should be "25". --Dweller (talk) 16:42, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep your nose outavit buddy... Well, it can go either way I think. My reading of the MOS says either are acceptable but Matthew likes words, I like words, you like parentheses, so let's call the whole thing off.... The Rambling Man (talk) 16:49, 10 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Support All issues resolved. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 15:18, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Support I mean, you are after all a mega-officianado. Can't argue with that. Drewcifer (talk) 11:45, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Comment for clarification re bold title.
 * Please have a look at WP:MOS and WP:LEAD. They say that the topic of the article should ideally appear as the subject of the first sentence and in bold face; but "if the topic of an article has no name and the title is merely descriptive", the title need not appear verbatim and if it does, it is not bolded. Personally, with these lists I'd lean towards the title being a descriptive one, but wouldn't have a problem if you think otherwise. However, if you are bolding the title, it should not contain wikilinks. Anything that needs linking should be linked later on in the paragraph/section. hope this helps, cheers, Struway2 (talk) 08:44, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for clearing that up for everyone (myself included) Struway2, I think I'll revert to not bold and a decent opening sentence... The Rambling Man (talk) 12:11, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.