Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of World Heritage Sites in Tunisia/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Hey man im josh via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 5 July 2024 (UTC).

List of World Heritage Sites in Tunisia

 * Nominator(s): Tone 20:52, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

Tunisia has nine World Heritage sites and 15 sites on the tentative lists. Several ancient cities and Roman remains, as well as desert locations. Standard style. The list for Morocco is already seeing some support so I am adding a new nomination. Tone 20:52, 12 May 2024 (UTC)


 * I don't know if there is a hard-and-fast rule, but I've noticed that nominators wait for 2 (or more) supports on an older nomination before starting a new one. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:15, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

MPGuy2824
 * "because of construction" to "because of the construction" - in the lead and the table
 * " resulted in reduction of vegetation and drop in bird numbers" to " resulted in a reduction of vegetation and a drop in bird numbers" - in the lead and the table
 * "between the 12th to the 16th centuries" to "between the 12th and 16th centuries"
 * wikilink "Islamic world"
 * " series of wars until the" to " series of wars, until the"
 * wikilink necropolis
 * The sentences about minor boundary changes don't seem important to the list.
 * "listed endangered" to "listed as endangered".
 * "By 2006, the situation has improved" to "By 2006, the situation had improved"
 * "As opposed to several Phoenician cities, such as Carthage, Byblos, or Tyre," to "Unlike other Phoenician cities, such as Carthage, Byblos, or Tyre,"
 * "The ruins, which date to the 4th and 3th centuries BCE and were discovered in 1952, provide an important insight into the Punic urban planning." to "The ruins, which date to the 4th and 3th centuries BCE were rediscovered in 1952, and provide an important insight into Punic urban planning."
 * "under the Aghlabids as a part of" to "under the Aghlabids, as a part of"
 * "The medina has been well preserved, with several monuments, including the Ribat, which is both a fortification and a religious building, the Great Mosque (pictured), the kasbah, the Bou Ftata Mosque, and fortifications." - too long and complicated. Please split.
 * "important Libyan–Punic settlement which" to "important Libyan–Punic settlement, which"
 * "lives here while" to "lives here, while".
 * "have been reintroduced" to "were reintroduced".
 * "mammals and reptiles and it" to "mammals and reptiles, and it".
 * I'll continue later. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:10, 14 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Continuing...
 * "As opposed to several sections of Roman Limes" to "Unlike several sections of Roman Limes".
 * "Sfax was the gateway and the port of Ifriqiya to the Levant." to "Sfax was the port of the Ifriqiya region, and its gateway to the Levant".
 * "Geological formation" to "The geological formation" in two entries.
 * "extinction event supporting" to "extinction event, supporting".
 * A couple of the refs are missing archive links.
 * That's all I got. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 12:53, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Done, thanks! I am trying to list the boundary modifications, either major (which get extra explanation) or minor, because this is still relevant - it is a list of WHS after all. And it explains why some numbers have bis or ter attached - I've had questions on that before :) Tone 08:35, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Support promotion. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:30, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

Comments

 * "By 2006 the situation has improved" => "By 2006 the situation had improved"
 * "The ruins, which date to the 4th and 3th centuries BCE were discovered in 1952" => "The ruins, which date to the 4th and 3th centuries BCE, were discovered in 1952"
 * "The island of Djerba has a semi dry climate" => "The island of Djerba has a semi-dry climate"
 * That's all I got! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:02, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Fixed! Two of these were already mentioned above and I just took care of them :) Tone 09:11, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
 * You still have "By 2006 the situation has improved" in the lead...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:38, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Right, fixed now :) Tone 14:39, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:32, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

Hey man im josh
Source review: Passed
 * Reliable enough for the information being cited
 * Consistent date formatting
 * Consistent and proper reference formatting
 * Appropriate wikilinks where applicable
 * Spot checks on 10 sources match what they are being cited for

Hey man im josh (talk) 13:36, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

Hey man im josh (talk) 13:37, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.