Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Dookudu/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 18:17, 4 October 2015.

List of accolades received by Dookudu

 * Nominator(s): — Pavanjandhyala (talk) 12:45, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

This article provides a listing of the notable awards and nominations received by the 2011 Indian Telugu action comedy film Dookudu, starring Mahesh Babu. This is my first film awards list at the FLC, and I hope to receive constructive comments to improve it. Yours sincerely, Pavanjandhyala (talk) 12:45, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Comments from Kailash I made a few tweaking edits, so this article has my support. Kailash29792 (talk) 13:22, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Just because you made a few "tweaks", you support this? &mdash; Vensatry (ping) 07:01, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Because the article is still up to my expectations, save for a few prose issues (which I fixed), so I support it. Kailash29792 (talk) 07:04, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Comments from FrB.TG 


 * Support – sorry for taking so much time. --  Frankie talk 09:26, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Support – First Class! — &#124; Gareth Griffith-Jones &#124; The Welsh Buzzard&#124; — 17:24, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Support – I can't really find any flaws in this list. Yashthepunisher (talk) 16:46, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Comments from West Virginian Support, per Featured list criteria, I assess that this list features professional standards of writing in the lede, the lede is engaging, the lede and list are indeed comprehensive, and the structure and style are both adequate. Congratulations on a job well done! -- West Virginian   (talk)  18:22, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Lede
 * Per Manual of Style/Lead section, the lede of this article stands alone as a concise overview and summary of the list. The lede defines the movie and its accolades, establishes context for the accolades, explains why the movie and its accolades are notable, and summarizes the most important points of the list.
 * The image of Mahesh Babu has been released into the public domain and it is therefore suitable for inclusion here.
 * The lede is well-written, its contents contains inline citations to verifiable references, and I have no further comments or suggestions for this section.

List
 * The list is beautifully formatted and each accolade is supported with an inline citation to a verifiable reference and I have no comments or suggestions for this list.

Comments from Onel5969 Support - nicely done article which meets all the criteria on Featured list criteria. West Virginian's comment are spot on. In addition, it's comprehensive, and meets the reqs for a stand alone list, it's style and navigability are fine. There are no edit wars in its history.  Onel 5969  TT me 12:38, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Comments - to the above reviewers: no sections please, per "Please do not split featured list candidate pages into subsections using header code (if necessary, use bolded headings)."
 * This may be personal preference but I'd like to know more about the film than who provided the editing and cinematography, so after introducing the main actors, I would actually describe the film.
 * Done


 * " creates a fake political setup for his father who recovers from a coma" this is a very succinct plot synopsis, I don't really get it at all.
 * I've elaborated the plot as per your advice. Further details about the film's production, if included, may increase the lead's size i opine.


 * You repeat his full name every time, his own article reverts to Mahesh after the intro.
 * Removed full name and delinked it in the lead except for the first mention.


 * " ₹" is overlinked.
 * Then, kindly suggest me how to denote that the budget and gross are Indian rupees in an apt way.
 * I just said it was overlinked, not that you shouldn't use the symbol. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:34, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Then, kindly let me know what to do?
 * Unlink the symbol the second time. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:11, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Then, how can we mention that the budget is in Indian currency?
 * Leave the first symbol linked and unlink the second. You link the symbol twice in the same sentence.  It's called overlinking.  The Rambling Man (talk) 16:33, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Done Delinked INR and also, removed the conversion rate i.e. replaced INRConvert template with INR. I hope that it does solve the issue.


 * "forty-four awards from fifty-six" MOSNUM would prescribe 44 from 56.
 * Cowlibob fixed it.


 * If awards aren't even notable enough for a red link, why are they included?
 * I've explained the same to Cowlibob during resolving his comments.
 * I don't think that's a reasonable explanation. If the award is notable within Wikipedia guidelines it should be redlinked, if it is not, it should be removed.  The Rambling Man (talk) 07:34, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Done. Redlinked them. — Ssven2  Speak 2 me 07:45, 15 September 2015 (UTC)


 * How does Category sort? I get Best Actor, then "Best Actor (Jury)" then "Best Actor - Telugu" (WP:DASH fail there, by the way), then "Best Actor in a Supporting Role" then .... then "Best Actor – Male"... it's not clear how this sorts at all.  I would suggest you force a reasonable sort using the sort template.
 * This doesn't appear to have been addressed. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:47, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I did not see an Indian FL where Category is sorted. Since the recipients and nominated are sorted, i see no particular reason to sort a category. If they are indeed sorted, please provide an example for the same.
 * Then the column should not be sortable. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:11, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Do you mean to add class="unsortable" to all the coloumns except Recipients and Nominees?
 * Well that's your decision, all I'm saying is that right now, the Category column sorts unintuitively. Either fix it, or make the column unsortable.  The Rambling Man (talk) 16:33, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Done Okay. I'm unsorting all coloumns except "Recipients and Nominees". Once i find a featured list that sorts categories, even though that happens after this list passes or fails, i will gladly and surely apply the same here.

The Rambling Man (talk) 16:55, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Why "FEFSI Vijayan" and not just "Vijayan"?
 * Done Fixed it. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 03:57, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Support But urge you to stub the red linked awards. Otherwise their notability looks questionable for inclusion!♦ Dr. Blofeld  09:43, 24 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Support: This list is Well-written, and from my POV meets the FL criteria. Good job Pavan. Krish |  Talk  19:28, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Support Well written, comprehensive and the references all check out fine. This definitely meets the FL criteria. Good job on the work so far! JAG  UAR   17:49, 29 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close.  Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the featured list candidates template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.  Giants2008  ( Talk ) 18:37, 4 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.