Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of ships of the Royal Yugoslav Navy/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 23:31, 18 March 2017 (UTC).

List of ships of the Royal Yugoslav Navy

 * Nominator(s): Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 00:36, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

This list covers all of the warships and large auxiliaries operated by the Royal Yugoslav Navy between its establishment immediately after World War I until its disbandment in the latter stages of World War II. It recently went through Milhist A-Class review and was significantly improved, with explanatory prose and ship characteristics added to the tables. This is my first naval FLC, my other two were orders of battle. All constructive criticism gratefully received. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 00:36, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Comments This is an excellent professional-grade summary. I have only the following comments: Support My comments are now addressed. Great work with this article: it really is a model for others. Nick-D (talk) 05:47, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
 * "Large auxiliary vessels such as submarine tenders and tankers are included, but hulks, tugs and smaller auxiliary craft are not." - is it possible to say that the list includes only commissioned ships, or did the Royal Yugoslav Navy not work this way? (I agree with this division though, which is common in listings of naval vessels - small craft and the like generally belong in lists of auxiliaries)
 * I don't believe we'd have a definitive split, plus I'm not sure they really operated that way. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:29, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
 * "All four were sunk at Salonika in October 1944" - were they scuttled by the Germans (from memory, this is when they were evacuating Greece), or sunk by Allied forces? Nick-D (talk) 03:18, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Scuttled. Fixed. Thanks for taking a look, ! Regards, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:29, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks Nick, it got improved a great deal during ACR. Regards, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:56, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Support - I reviewed the list at the ACR, and my concerns were addressed there. Great work. Parsecboy (talk) 16:06, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Comments Support I reviewed this at ACR, but I have another concern.
 * Regarding the citations in the tables, with reference to List of destroyers of India, List of battleships of Germany, List of heavy cruisers of Germany, List of battlecruisers of the United States etc. where it is instantly clear where each statistic in the tables comes from. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 04:41, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I think it is pretty clear that the citations of the text cover the table below. Re-citing each column or row would just create unnecessary clutter. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:00, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I do know that. But this issue was put in by during my "List of destroyers of India" FLC. May be he could give us an opinion. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 05:37, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Sure, although I think Rupert is taking a break from reviewing at present. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:38, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Support, my only problem with the article was if the text citation covered the table info, which it does. You may wish to make some note of that, either in hidden text, or an .  Iazyges   Consermonor   Opus meum  15:13, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for taking a look. Given made a similar comment, I've added a note to cover this issue. Cheers, Peacemaker67  (click to talk to me) 00:33, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Source review passed, promoting. -- Pres N  02:36, 18 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.