Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/MewithoutYou discography/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 26 July 2021 (UTC).

MewithoutYou discography

 * Nominator(s): Guerillero  Parlez Moi 22:47, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

I will admit that this list is outside of my wheelhouse, but following the example of past FLs I think this is ready -- Guerillero Parlez Moi 22:47, 28 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:45, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Source review — Pass
Will do soon. Aza24 (talk) 01:35, 2 March 2021 (UTC)


 * is there really no other refs for the music videos other than mewithoutYou's website? It would be better to avoid primary sources...
 * I can't find the information in a better place -- Guerillero Parlez Moi 03:06, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Fair enough, just thought I'd check. Aza24 (talk) 01:51, 5 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Formatting
 * I'm not sure Jonathan Bautts can count as the publisher for ref 2
 * Removed -- Guerillero Parlez Moi 03:06, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
 * your inclusion of locations is inconsistent, unless there is some pattern I'm not identifying
 * Removed -- Guerillero Parlez Moi 03:06, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
 * You link Billboard but no other publishers/works, I suggest unlinking
 * Unlinked -- Guerillero Parlez Moi 03:06, 2 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Reliability
 * What makes Jonathan Bautts a reliable source?
 * I see that you have been reading my FAC reviews :P It is an interview with one of the band members and the answer comes directly from them. This was a hard one, because of how old the EP is and how rarely people ask the band about Blood Enough For Us All. I can go back to looking for a better source, but I haven't found much. The internet is devoid of references to the EP and there is nothing in newspapers about it. -- Guerillero Parlez Moi 03:06, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Sounds good Aza24 (talk) 01:51, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * What makes Punk news a reliable source?
 * Punk news is a 22 year old publication with editors. -- Guerillero Parlez Moi 03:06, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
 * OK, see below. Aza24 (talk) 01:51, 5 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Verifiability
 * spotchecks not done. Will probably do some later. Aza24 (talk) 01:50, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Have checked a couple (15, 27, 35, 21), looks good.


 * please let me know what you think -- Guerillero  Parlez Moi 01:46, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I was in the middle of looking when you pinged! Given the lesser sourcing restrictions for FLC (vs FAC) I'm inclined to let certain sources be permissible. Give me a second to do some spotchecks... Aza24 (talk) 01:51, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Alright, pass for source review. Good work! Aza24 (talk) 01:56, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Comments from Dank
 * Standard disclaimer: I don't know what I'm doing, and I mostly AGF on sourcing.
 * If any of the tables needs sortability, it would be the one called "Music". I think I buy that the table is short enough that sortability wouldn't make a big difference ... but I'm open to thoughts that you or the other reviewers have on this.
 * FLC criteria:
 * 1. The prose is fine. I've done a little copyediting; feel free to revert or discuss. The table coding is fine. I sampled the links in the tables.
 * 2. The lead meets WP:LEAD and defines the inclusion criteria.
 * 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations.
 * 3b. The UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems. All relevant retrieval dates are present. The source review should have this criterion covered.
 * 3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content fork, it doesn't largely duplicate another article (that I can find), and it wouldn't fit easily inside another article.
 * 4. It is navigable.
 * 5. It meets style requirements. The one image seems fine.
 * 6. It is stable.
 * Support. Well done. (I hope you'll drop by my plant list nominations every now and then, but they tend to be long, so don't sweat it.) - Dank (push to talk) 01:54, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Can take a look. I have an old FLC myself, if you are interested.
 * let me know what you think -- Guerillero Parlez Moi 01:07, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
 * a second ping about your review -- In actu (Guerillero) Parlez Moi 14:45, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Comments from Eddie891
 * "The band was formed in 2001 as a side project to The Operation, an alternative band that shares most of its members with mewithoutYou that was active between 1999 and 2001" I don't really like 'that shares... that was", imo it makes the sentence feel a little clunky. Can you rephrase, maybe "The Operation, an alternative band active from 1999 to 2001 that shared most of its members with mewithoutYou"?
 * Done -- In actu (Guerillero) Parlez Moi 14:34, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * "as a mewithoutYou release is murky." can you expand on this? what does 'official status' mean? What does 'murky' mean? Maybe add note 2 here...
 * I removed that and moved to calling it a demo which is more representative of what it is. -- In actu (Guerillero) Parlez Moi 14:34, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * link campfire songs? Eddie891 Talk Work 15:57, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Done -- In actu (Guerillero) Parlez Moi 14:34, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Let me know what you think, Eddie891 -- In actu (Guerillero) Parlez Moi 14:34, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I Feel this meets the FL criteria, support Eddie891 Talk Work 15:01, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Giants2008 ( Talk ) 21:08, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.